Suppr超能文献

铁过载治疗的进展。去铁酮(L1)、去铁胺、新型实验性螯合剂ICL670、GT56 - 252、L1NA11及其组合的有效应用前景。

Advances in iron overload therapies. prospects for effective use of deferiprone (L1), deferoxamine, the new experimental chelators ICL670, GT56-252, L1NA11 and their combinations.

作者信息

Kontoghiorghes George J, Eracleous Eleni, Economides Charalambos, Kolnagou Annita

机构信息

Postgraduate Research Institute of Science, Technology, Environment and Medicine, 3 Ammochostou Street, Limassol 3021, Cyprus.

出版信息

Curr Med Chem. 2005;12(23):2663-81. doi: 10.2174/092986705774463003.

Abstract

Effective new therapies and mechanisms have been developed for the targeting and prevention of iron overload and toxicity in thalassaemia and idiopathic haemochromatosis patients. A new era in the development of chelating drugs began with the introduction of deferiprone or L1, which as a monotherapy or in combination with deferoxamine can be used universally for effective chelation treatments, rapid iron removal, maintenance of low iron stores and prevention of heart and other organ damage caused by iron overload. Several experimental iron chelators such as deferasirox (4-[3,5-bis (2-hydroxyphenyl)-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl]-benzoic acid) or ICL670, deferitrin (4,5-dihydro-2- (2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-4-methylthiazole-4 (S)-carboxylic acid) or GT56-252, 1-allyl-2-methyl-3-hydroxypyrid-4-one or L1NAll and starch deferoxamine polymers have reached different stages of clinical development. The lipophilic ICL670, which can only be administered once daily is generally ineffective in causing negative iron balance but is effective in reducing liver iron. It is suspected that it may increase iron absorption and the redistribution of iron from the liver to the heart and other organs. The experimental iron chelators do not appear to have significant advantages in efficacy and toxicity by comparison to deferiprone, deferoxamine or their combination. However, the prospect of combination therapies using deferiprone, deferoxamine and new chelators will provide new mechanisms of chelator interactions, which may lead to higher efficacy and lower toxicity by comparison to monotherapies. A major disadvantage of the experimental chelators is that even if they are approved for clinical use, they are unlikely to be as inexpensive as deferiprone and become available to the vast majority of thalassaemia patients, who live in developing countries.

摘要

针对地中海贫血和特发性血色素沉着症患者的铁过载及毒性问题,已研发出有效的新疗法和作用机制。随着去铁酮(L1)的问世,螯合药物的研发进入了一个新时代。去铁酮作为单一疗法或与去铁胺联合使用,可广泛用于有效的螯合治疗、快速清除铁、维持低铁储存以及预防铁过载引起的心脏和其他器官损伤。几种实验性铁螯合剂,如地拉罗司(4-[3,5-双(2-羟苯基)-1,2,4-三唑-1-基]-苯甲酸)或ICL670、去铁蛋白(4,5-二氢-2-(2,4-二羟基苯基)-4-甲基噻唑-4(S)-羧酸)或GT56-252、1-烯丙基-2-甲基-3-羟基吡啶-4-酮或L1NAll以及淀粉去铁胺聚合物,已进入不同的临床开发阶段。亲脂性的ICL并不能有效造成负铁平衡,但对降低肝脏铁含量有效,且一般仅需每日给药一次。有人怀疑它可能会增加铁的吸收,并使铁从肝脏重新分布到心脏和其他器官。与去铁酮、去铁胺或它们的组合相比,实验性铁螯合剂在疗效和毒性方面似乎没有显著优势。然而,使用去铁酮、去铁胺和新螯合剂的联合疗法有望提供新的螯合剂相互作用机制,与单一疗法相比,可能会带来更高的疗效和更低的毒性。实验性螯合剂的一个主要缺点是,即使它们获批用于临床,也不太可能像去铁酮那样价格低廉,从而让生活在发展中国家的绝大多数地中海贫血患者能够使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验