Manzi Fatuma, Schellenberg Joanna Armstrong, Adam Taghreed, Mshinda Hassan, Victora Cesar G, Bryce Jennifer
Ifakara Health Research and Development Centre, P.O. Box 78373, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Health Policy Plan. 2005 Dec;20 Suppl 1:i85-i93. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czi059.
Catastrophic payments and fairness in financial contributions for health care are becoming increasing concerns for many governments. Out-of-pocket financing for health care is common in many developing countries, including Tanzania. As part of the Multi-Country Evaluation of the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (MCE-IMCI), the objective of this paper is to explore the determinants of variation and the level of out-of-pocket payments for child health care in rural Tanzania, with and without IMCI, using data from two household surveys conducted in 1999 and 2002. We analyzed data for 833 visits to health providers for 764 children who had been sick in the 2 weeks prior to the survey and who had sought care at a 'Western' or formal health care provider. We found evidence that IMCI was associated with lower out-of-pocket costs at government facilities (Tshs.3.5 compared with Tshs.6.9 without IMCI) and in NGOs (Tshs.95.1 compared with Tshs.267.3). Out-of-pocket payments were on average Tshs.110.1 when care was sought at government primary health care facilities running a cost-sharing scheme, about 15 times higher than in those not part of the scheme (p<0.0001). Those who visited NGO facilities paid about 30 times more than those seeking care at government facilities not operating the cost-sharing scheme (p<0.0001). In conclusion, there is no doubt that health care financing mechanisms and equitable access to government facilities have a major impact on household economic burden related to under-five illness. Increasing access to IMCI-based care, however, offers an additional opportunity to reduce out-of-pocket payments, mainly through more rational use of medicines. Increasing access to IMCI-based care would not only improve inequities in financial contributions, but also in health, an important consideration for its own sake.
灾难性医疗支出以及医疗保健费用分担的公平性问题日益受到许多国家政府的关注。包括坦桑尼亚在内的许多发展中国家,医疗保健的自费融资十分普遍。作为儿童疾病综合管理多国评估(MCE-IMCI)的一部分,本文旨在利用1999年和2002年两次家庭调查的数据,探究在有和没有儿童疾病综合管理(IMCI)的情况下,坦桑尼亚农村地区儿童医疗保健自费支出的差异决定因素及支出水平。我们分析了833次就诊的数据,这些就诊是由764名在调查前两周生病并在“西医”或正规医疗保健机构寻求治疗的儿童进行的。我们发现,有证据表明,儿童疾病综合管理(IMCI)与政府医疗机构较低的自费成本相关(有IMCI时为3.5先令,无IMCI时为6.9先令),在非政府组织(NGO)中也是如此(有IMCI时为95.1先令,无IMCI时为267.3先令)。在实施费用分担计划的政府初级卫生保健机构寻求治疗时,自费支出平均为110.1先令,比未参与该计划的机构高出约15倍(p<0.0001)。那些到非政府组织(NGO)机构就诊的人支付的费用比在未实施费用分担计划的政府机构寻求治疗的人高出约30倍(p<0.0001)。总之,毫无疑问,医疗保健融资机制以及公平使用政府医疗机构对与五岁以下儿童疾病相关的家庭经济负担有重大影响。然而,增加获得基于儿童疾病综合管理(IMCI)的护理的机会,提供了一个额外的机会来减少自费支出,主要是通过更合理地使用药物。增加获得基于儿童疾病综合管理(IMCI)的护理的机会不仅会改善费用分担方面的不公平现象,还会改善健康方面不公平现象,这本身就是一个重要的考虑因素。