• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产的经济后果:来自坦桑尼亚家庭调查的证据。

Economic consequences of caesarean section delivery: evidence from a household survey in Tanzania.

机构信息

Department of Health System, Impact Evaluation and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, PO Box 78373, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Chr. Michelsen Institute, PO Box 6033, N-5892, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec 29;21(1):1367. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07386-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-07386-0
PMID:34965864
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8715568/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Caesarean section (C-section) delivery is an important indicator of access to life-saving essential obstetric care. Yet, there is limited understanding of the costs of utilising C-section delivery care in sub-Saharan Africa. Thus, we estimated the direct and indirect patient cost of accessing C-section in Tanzania.

METHODS

Cross-sectional survey data of 2012 was used, which covered 3000 households from 11 districts in three regions. We interviewed women who had given births in the last 12 months before the survey to capture their experience of care. We used a regression model to estimate the effect of C-section on costs, while the degree of inequality on C-section coverage was assessed with a concentration index.

RESULTS

C-section increased the likelihood of paying for health care by 16% compared to normal delivery. The additional cost of C-section compared to normal delivery was 20 USD, but reduced to about 11 USD when restricted to public facilities. Women with C-section delivery spent an extra 2 days at the health facility compared to normal delivery, but this was reduced slightly to 1.9 days in public facilities. The distribution of C-section coverage was significantly in favour of wealthier than poorest women (CI = 0.2052, p < 0.01), and this pro-rich pattern was consistent in rural districts but with unclear pattern in urban districts.

CONCLUSIONS

C-section is a life-saving intervention but is associated with significant economic burden especially among the poor families. More health resources are needed for provision of free maternal care, reduce inequality in access and improve birth outcomes in Tanzania.

摘要

背景

剖宫产是获得救命基本产科护理的一个重要指标。然而,对于撒哈拉以南非洲地区利用剖宫产分娩护理的成本,人们了解有限。因此,我们评估了坦桑尼亚获取剖宫产的直接和间接患者成本。

方法

使用了 2012 年的横断面调查数据,该数据覆盖了来自三个地区 11 个区的 3000 户家庭。我们采访了在调查前 12 个月内分娩的妇女,以了解她们的护理经历。我们使用回归模型来估计剖宫产对成本的影响,而剖宫产覆盖率的不平等程度则通过集中指数进行评估。

结果

与正常分娩相比,剖宫产使支付医疗费用的可能性增加了 16%。与正常分娩相比,剖宫产的额外费用为 20 美元,但在限制在公立机构时,这一费用降至约 11 美元。与正常分娩相比,接受剖宫产的妇女在卫生机构多花费 2 天,但在公立机构中,这一数字略有减少至 1.9 天。剖宫产的覆盖率分布明显有利于比最贫困妇女更富裕的妇女(CI=0.2052,p<0.01),这种有利于富人的模式在农村地区是一致的,但在城市地区模式不明确。

结论

剖宫产是一种救命干预措施,但会给贫困家庭带来巨大的经济负担。坦桑尼亚需要更多的卫生资源来提供免费的产妇护理,减少获取方面的不平等,改善生育结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf0/8715568/f313f1fabb28/12913_2021_7386_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf0/8715568/f68167d51ca7/12913_2021_7386_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf0/8715568/f313f1fabb28/12913_2021_7386_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf0/8715568/f68167d51ca7/12913_2021_7386_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf0/8715568/f313f1fabb28/12913_2021_7386_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Economic consequences of caesarean section delivery: evidence from a household survey in Tanzania.剖宫产的经济后果:来自坦桑尼亚家庭调查的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec 29;21(1):1367. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07386-0.
2
Where do the rural poor deliver when high coverage of health facility delivery is achieved? Findings from a community and hospital survey in Tanzania.在实现了较高的医疗机构分娩覆盖率的情况下,农村贫困人口在哪里分娩?坦桑尼亚一项社区与医院调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 2;9(12):e113995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113995. eCollection 2014.
3
Maternal mortality and distance to facility-based obstetric care in rural southern Tanzania: a secondary analysis of cross-sectional census data in 226 000 households.坦桑尼亚南部农村地区产妇死亡率与以设施为基础的产科护理距离:对 226000 户家庭横断面普查数据的二次分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Jul;3(7):e387-95. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00048-0. Epub 2015 May 21.
4
Spatial patterns and inequalities in skilled birth attendance and caesarean delivery in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲熟练接生和剖腹产的空间模式和不平等。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Oct;6(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007074.
5
Caesarean section provision and readiness in Tanzania: analysis of cross-sectional surveys of women and health facilities over time.坦桑尼亚剖宫产的提供情况与准备程度:对不同时期妇女及卫生设施横断面调查的分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 4;8(9):e024216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024216.
6
Effect of maternal height on caesarean section and neonatal mortality rates in sub-Saharan Africa: An analysis of 34 national datasets.撒哈拉以南非洲地区孕产妇身高对剖宫产率和新生儿死亡率的影响:对34个国家数据集的分析
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 6;13(2):e0192167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192167. eCollection 2018.
7
Inequity in uptake of hospital-based childbirth care in rural Tanzania: analysis of the 2015-16 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey.坦桑尼亚农村地区医院分娩服务利用的不平等:2015-2016 年坦桑尼亚人口与健康调查分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Oct 12;36(9):1428-1440. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab079.
8
Readiness of health facilities to provide safe childbirth in Liberia: a cross-sectional analysis of population surveys, facility censuses and facility birth records.利比里亚卫生机构提供安全分娩服务的准备情况:基于人口调查、机构普查和机构分娩记录的横断面分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Dec 20;22(1):952. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05301-x.
9
Two decades of antenatal and delivery care in Uganda: a cross-sectional study using Demographic and Health Surveys.乌干达二十年的产前和分娩护理:一项利用人口与健康调查的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 4;18(1):758. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3546-3.
10
Magnitude and trends in socio-economic and geographic inequality in access to birth by cesarean section in Tanzania: evidence from five rounds of Tanzania demographic and health surveys (1996-2015).坦桑尼亚剖宫产分娩的社会经济和地理不平等的程度及趋势:来自五轮坦桑尼亚人口与健康调查(1996 - 2015年)的证据
Arch Public Health. 2020 Sep 15;78:80. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00466-3. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and determinants of caesarean sections among women in selected health facilities in Njombe region, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚恩琼贝地区部分医疗机构中女性剖宫产的患病率及其决定因素
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 29;15(1):31895. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10407-1.
2
Prevalence and associated factors of caesarean section delivery: analysis from the Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2022.剖宫产分娩的患病率及相关因素:来自2022年尼泊尔人口与健康调查的分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 22;15(3):e090209. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090209.
3
Disclosing possible nonmedically indicated cesarean sections in 5 high-volume urban maternity units in Tanzania: a criterion-based clinical audit.

本文引用的文献

1
Supply-side factors influencing informal payment for healthcare services in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚医疗服务中供方因素对非正式支付的影响。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Aug 12;36(7):1036-1044. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab034.
2
Patient and health system costs of managing pregnancy and birth-related complications in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区管理妊娠及分娩相关并发症的患者和卫生系统成本:一项系统评价
Health Econ Rev. 2020 Aug 15;10(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00283-y.
3
Barriers to access and utilization of emergency obstetric care at health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of literature.
坦桑尼亚5家高产量城市产科单位中可能存在的非医学指征剖宫产的披露:基于标准的临床审计
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Dec 21;5(1):100437. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100437. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Out of pocket expenditure and distress financing on cesarean delivery in India: evidence from NFHS-5.印度剖宫产的自费支出和困境融资:来自 NFHS-5 的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 7;23(1):966. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09980-w.
5
How can we elicit health workers' preferences for measures to reduce informal payments? A mixed methods approach to developing a discrete choice experiment in Tanzania.我们如何了解卫生工作者对减少非正规支付措施的偏好?坦桑尼亚开发离散选择实验的混合方法。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 7;13(7):e068781. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068781.
6
Global increased cesarean section rates and public health implications: A call to action.全球剖宫产率上升及其对公共卫生的影响:行动呼吁。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 May 18;6(5):e1274. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1274. eCollection 2023 May.
撒哈拉以南非洲卫生机构获取和利用紧急产科护理的障碍:文献系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 13;7(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0842-2.
4
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.全球剖宫产使用情况及差异的流行病学研究。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7.
5
The impact of reducing and eliminating user fees on facility-based delivery: a controlled interrupted time series in Burkina Faso.降低和取消用户费用对医疗机构分娩的影响:布基纳法索的一项对照中断时间序列研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Oct 1;33(8):948-956. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy077.
6
Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali?免费剖宫产政策是否会加剧贝宁和马里的不平等?
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 5;17(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0789-x.
7
Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries.剖宫产率的国内不平等现象:对72个低收入和中等收入国家的观察性研究
BMJ. 2018 Jan 24;360:k55. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k55.
8
Health financing policies in Sub-Saharan Africa: government ownership or donors' influence? A scoping review of policymaking processes.撒哈拉以南非洲地区的卫生筹资政策:政府主导还是受捐助方影响?对决策过程的范围界定审查
Glob Health Res Policy. 2017 Aug 8;2:23. doi: 10.1186/s41256-017-0043-x. eCollection 2017.
9
Financing transformative health systems towards achievement of the health Sustainable Development Goals: a model for projected resource needs in 67 low-income and middle-income countries.为实现卫生可持续发展目标而构建变革性卫生系统的筹资:67 个低收入和中等收入国家预计资源需求模型。
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Sep;5(9):e875-e887. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30263-2. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
10
Analysis of dropout across the continuum of maternal health care in Tanzania: findings from a cross-sectional household survey.坦桑尼亚孕产妇保健连续过程中的失访情况分析:一项横断面家庭调查的结果
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Jul 1;32(6):791-799. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx005.