Liese Angela D, Schulz Mandy, Fang Fang, Wolever Thomas M S, D'Agostino Ralph B, Sparks Karen C, Mayer-Davis Elizabeth J
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 800 Sumter Street, Columbia, SC 29205, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2005 Dec;28(12):2832-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.12.2832.
We studied the association of digestible carbohydrates, fiber intake, glycemic index, and glycemic load with insulin sensitivity (S(I)), fasting insulin, acute insulin response (AIR), disposition index, BMI, and waist circumference.
Data on 979 adults with normal (67%) and impaired (33%) glucose tolerance from the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (1992-1994) were analyzed. Usual dietary intake was assessed via a 114-item interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaire from which nutrient intakes were estimated. Published glycemic index values were assigned to food items and average dietary glycemic index and glycemic load calculated per subject. S(I) and AIR were determined by frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Disposition index was calculated by multiplying S(I) with AIR. Multiple linear regression modeling was employed.
No association was observed between glycemic index and S(I), fasting insulin, AIR, disposition index, BMI, or waist circumference after adjustment for demographic characteristics or family history of diabetes, energy expenditure, and smoking. Associations observed for digestible carbohydrates and glycemic load, respectively, with S(I), insulin secretion, and adiposity (adjusted for demographics and main confounders) were entirely explained by energy intake. In contrast, fiber was associated positively with S(I) and disposition index and inversely with fasting insulin, BMI, and waist circumference but not with AIR.
Carbohydrates as reflected in glycemic index and glycemic load may not be related to measures of insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, and adiposity. Fiber intake may not only have beneficial effects on insulin sensitivity and adiposity, but also on pancreatic functionality.
我们研究了可消化碳水化合物、纤维摄入量、血糖指数和血糖负荷与胰岛素敏感性(S(I))、空腹胰岛素、急性胰岛素反应(AIR)、处置指数、体重指数(BMI)和腰围之间的关联。
分析了胰岛素抵抗动脉粥样硬化研究(1992 - 1994年)中979名葡萄糖耐量正常(67%)和受损(33%)的成年人的数据。通过一份由访员管理的包含114个条目的食物频率问卷评估日常饮食摄入量,并据此估算营养素摄入量。将已公布的血糖指数值赋予食物项目,并计算每位受试者的平均饮食血糖指数和血糖负荷。通过频繁采样的静脉葡萄糖耐量试验测定S(I)和AIR。处置指数通过将S(I)与AIR相乘计算得出。采用多元线性回归模型。
在调整人口统计学特征或糖尿病家族史、能量消耗和吸烟因素后,未观察到血糖指数与S(I)、空腹胰岛素、AIR、处置指数、BMI或腰围之间存在关联。分别观察到的可消化碳水化合物和血糖负荷与S(I)、胰岛素分泌和肥胖(根据人口统计学和主要混杂因素进行调整)之间的关联完全由能量摄入来解释。相比之下,纤维与S(I)和处置指数呈正相关,与空腹胰岛素、BMI和腰围呈负相关,但与AIR无关。
血糖指数和血糖负荷所反映的碳水化合物可能与胰岛素敏感性、胰岛素分泌和肥胖的指标无关。纤维摄入可能不仅对胰岛素敏感性和肥胖有益,而且对胰腺功能也有益。