• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比马前列素、拉坦前列素和曲伏前列素治疗原发性开角型青光眼的分析性综述

Analytic review of bimatoprost, latanoprost and travoprost in primary open angle glaucoma.

作者信息

Holmstrom Stefan, Buchholz Patricia, Walt John, Wickstrøm Jannie, Aagren Mark

机构信息

Allergan Europe, Pforzheimer Str. 160, D-76275 Ettlingen, Germany.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Nov;21(11):1875-83. doi: 10.1185/030079905X65600.

DOI:10.1185/030079905X65600
PMID:16307709
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to evaluate different measures of efficacy of the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering lipid class agents bimatoprost, latanoprost and travoprost in the treatment of primary open angle glaucoma. Study arms of timolol in trials including the above mentioned lipid class drugs were also included.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for randomized clinical trials including one or more of the lipid class drugs bimatoprost, latanoprost and travoprost. The study results were pooled, and the simple, weighted IOP-lowering efficacy was compared among the lipid class drugs and timolol, where data were available. Efficacy parameters were reviewed, including mean reduction of IOP and percentage of patients achieving different levels of IOP.

RESULTS

161 articles were identified of which 42 were included in the analysis. A total of 9295 patients participated in the included trials. Based on all studies, timolol on average had a weighted mean IOP reduction of 22.2%, while latanoprost, travoprost and bimatoprost had a weighted mean IOP reduction of 26.7%, 28.7% and 30.3%, respectively. Analysis of target achievement to various IOP levels shows that bimatoprost seems more efficacious than latanoprost. The direct comparisons (head-to-head studies) also show that bimatoprost is the most efficacious treatment, however it is not conclusive whether latanoprost or travoprost is better in reducing IOP.

CONCLUSIONS

This review shows that bimatoprost seems to be the most efficacious treatment in lowering IOP. Head-to-head studies confirm this.

摘要

目的

本综述的目的是评估降低眼压的脂质类药物比马前列素、拉坦前列素和曲伏前列素在治疗原发性开角型青光眼方面的不同疗效指标。纳入了包含上述脂质类药物的试验中噻吗洛尔的研究组。

方法

检索MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库,查找包含比马前列素、拉坦前列素和曲伏前列素中一种或多种脂质类药物的随机临床试验。汇总研究结果,并在有数据的情况下,比较脂质类药物和噻吗洛尔之间简单的加权眼压降低疗效。回顾疗效参数,包括眼压的平均降低值和达到不同眼压水平的患者百分比。

结果

共识别出161篇文章,其中42篇纳入分析。共有9295名患者参与了纳入的试验。基于所有研究,噻吗洛尔平均加权眼压降低值为22.2%,而拉坦前列素、曲伏前列素和比马前列素的加权眼压平均降低值分别为26.7%、28.7%和30.3%。对达到不同眼压水平的目标达成情况分析表明,比马前列素似乎比拉坦前列素更有效。直接比较(头对头研究)也表明比马前列素是最有效的治疗方法,然而拉坦前列素或曲伏前列素在降低眼压方面哪个更好尚无定论。

结论

本综述表明,比马前列素似乎是降低眼压最有效的治疗方法。头对头研究证实了这一点。

相似文献

1
Analytic review of bimatoprost, latanoprost and travoprost in primary open angle glaucoma.比马前列素、拉坦前列素和曲伏前列素治疗原发性开角型青光眼的分析性综述
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Nov;21(11):1875-83. doi: 10.1185/030079905X65600.
2
Cost-effectiveness of monotherapy treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension with the lipid class of medications.使用脂质类药物单药治疗青光眼和高眼压症的成本效益。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jan;141(1 Suppl):S15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.06.030.
3
A 6-week, double-masked, parallel-group study of the efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% compared with latanoprost 0:005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.一项为期6周的双盲平行组研究,比较0.004%曲伏前列素与0.005%拉坦前列素/0.5%噻吗洛尔治疗原发性开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者的疗效和安全性。
Clin Ther. 2006 Mar;28(3):332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.03.001.
4
24-Hour IOP control with once-daily bimatoprost, timolol gel-forming solution, or latanoprost: a 1-month, randomized, comparative clinical trial.使用每日一次的比马前列素、噻吗洛尔凝胶剂或拉坦前列素进行24小时眼压控制:一项为期1个月的随机对照临床试验。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar;49 Suppl 1:S26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2003.12.017.
5
The cost-effectiveness of bimatoprost, latanoprost and timolol in treatment of primary open angle glaucoma in five European countries.比马前列素、拉坦前列素和噻吗洛尔治疗五个欧洲国家原发性开角型青光眼的成本效益
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 May;22(5):897-905. doi: 10.1185/030079906X104687.
6
Comparison of the effects of bimatoprost and a fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol on circadian intraocular pressure.比马前列素与拉坦前列素和噻吗洛尔固定组合对昼夜眼压影响的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2007 Dec;114(12):2244-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.01.025. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
7
Comparison of Travoprost and Bimatoprost plus timolol fixed combinations in open-angle glaucoma patients previously treated with latanoprost plus timolol fixed combination.比较曲伏前列素和贝美前列素加噻吗洛尔固定组合在以前用拉坦前列素加噻吗洛尔固定组合治疗的开角型青光眼患者中的疗效。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Oct;150(4):575-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
8
The effect of latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost on circadian variation of intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma.拉坦前列素、比马前列素和曲伏前列素对开角型青光眼患者眼压昼夜变化的影响。
J Glaucoma. 2008 Jan-Feb;17(1):36-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318133fb70.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of prostaglandin analogs: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.前列腺素类似物的疗效与耐受性:一项随机对照临床试验的荟萃分析
J Glaucoma. 2008 Dec;17(8):667-73. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181666557.
10
Meta-analysis of 24-hour intraocular pressure studies evaluating the efficacy of glaucoma medicines.评估青光眼药物疗效的24小时眼压研究的荟萃分析。
Ophthalmology. 2008 Jul;115(7):1117-1122.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.004. Epub 2008 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Synthesis and Enzymatic Evaluation of a Small Library of Substituted Phenylsulfonamido-Alkyl Sulfamates towards Carbonic Anhydrase II.合成及替代苯磺酰胺基-烷基磺酸盐对碳酸酐酶 II 的酶促评估的小文库。
Molecules. 2024 Jun 25;29(13):3015. doi: 10.3390/molecules29133015.
2
From Eye Care to Hair Growth: Bimatoprost.从眼部护理到头发生长:比马前列素。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Apr 27;17(5):561. doi: 10.3390/ph17050561.
3
What can we learn from a Chinese social media used by glaucoma patients?我们能从青光眼患者使用的中文社交媒体中学到什么?
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov 20;23(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03208-5.
4
Efficacy of bimatoprost for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.比马前列素治疗原发性开角型青光眼的疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 5;99(23):e20356. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020356.
5
Efficacy of travoprost for the treatment of patients with glaucoma.曲伏前列素治疗青光眼患者的疗效。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(29):e16526. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016526.
6
Comparison of Efficacy and Ocular Surface Disease Index Score between Bimatoprost, Latanoprost, Travoprost, and Tafluprost in Glaucoma Patients.比马前列素、拉坦前列素、曲伏前列素和他氟前列素在青光眼患者中的疗效及眼表疾病指数评分比较
J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 7;2018:1319628. doi: 10.1155/2018/1319628. eCollection 2018.
7
Does the intraocular pressure-lowering effect of prostaglandin analogues continue over the long term?前列腺素类似物的降眼压作用是否能长期持续?
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;37(3):619-626. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0315-3. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
8
Fixed-combination treatments for intraocular hypertension in Chinese patients - focus on bimatoprost-timolol.中国患者眼压升高的固定复方治疗——聚焦于比马前列素-噻吗洛尔
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 May 13;9:2617-25. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S80338. eCollection 2015.
9
Safety and efficacy of travoprost solution for the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure.曲伏前列素溶液治疗眼压升高的安全性和有效性。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr 10;9:633-43. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S61444. eCollection 2015.
10
Comparing the efficacy of latanoprost (0.005%), bimatoprost (0.03%), travoprost (0.004%), and timolol (0.5%) in the treatment of primary open angle glaucoma.比较拉坦前列素(0.005%)、比马前列素(0.03%)、曲伏前列素(0.004%)和噻吗洛尔(0.5%)治疗原发性开角型青光眼的疗效。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct;28(5):399-407. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.5.399. Epub 2014 Sep 18.