Suppr超能文献

住院和门诊白内障手术的结果。一项历史性队列比较。

Results of inpatient and outpatient cataract surgery. A historical cohort comparison.

作者信息

Holland G N, Earl D T, Wheeler N C, Straatsma B R, Pettit T H, Hepler R S, Christensen R E, Oye R K

机构信息

Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA 90024-7003.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 1992 Jun;99(6):845-52. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31882-2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The transition from inpatient to outpatient cataract surgery during the last decade was not accompanied by prospective investigation of its effect on visual outcomes or surgical complications. The authors performed this study to assess the impact of this transition on surgical results.

METHODS

The authors reviewed 600 extracapsular cataract extractions performed by 4 experienced ophthalmic surgeons during a 36-month period; in 300 cases, patients were hospitalized after surgery (inpatient group), and, in 300 cases, patients were never hospitalized (outpatient group). The same surgical techniques were used in all cases. Visual outcome and rates for operative and postoperative complications were compared.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the inpatient and outpatient groups for visual acuity. Excluding patients with pre-existing nonlenticular ocular disease, a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better was achieved in 93.1% of inpatient cases and in 97.2% of outpatient cases 6 months after surgery. Postoperative, clinically apparent cystoid macular edema was more common in the inpatient group (P = 0.03); however, after exclusion of patients with diabetes, hypertension, age younger than 65 years, and eyes with pre-existing nonlenticular disease, there was no statistically significant difference between groups. No significant differences in rates for other operative and postoperative complications were identified, including wound dehiscence, unplanned postoperative filtering blebs, infectious endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, persistent iridocyclitis, glaucoma, and corneal edema.

CONCLUSION

This study does not demonstrate that the transition to outpatient cataract extractions has had an adverse effect on surgical outcomes.

摘要

目的

在过去十年中,白内障手术从住院手术向门诊手术的转变未伴有对其对视力结果或手术并发症影响的前瞻性研究。作者进行本研究以评估这种转变对手术结果的影响。

方法

作者回顾了4位经验丰富的眼科医生在36个月期间进行的600例白内障囊外摘除术;其中300例患者术后住院(住院组),300例患者从未住院(门诊组)。所有病例均采用相同的手术技术。比较了视力结果以及手术中和术后并发症的发生率。

结果

住院组和门诊组之间的视力在统计学上无显著差异。排除术前存在非晶状体性眼病的患者后,术后6个月,住院组93.1%的病例和门诊组97.2%的病例最佳矫正视力达到20/40或更好。术后,临床上明显的黄斑囊样水肿在住院组中更常见(P = 0.03);然而,在排除糖尿病、高血压、年龄小于65岁以及术前存在非晶状体性眼病的患者后,两组之间在统计学上无显著差异。未发现其他手术中和术后并发症发生率的显著差异,包括伤口裂开、计划外的术后滤过泡、感染性眼内炎、视网膜脱离、持续性虹膜睫状体炎、青光眼和角膜水肿。

结论

本研究未表明向门诊白内障摘除术的转变对手术结果有不利影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验