• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮气管切开术:一个中心对一种新方法的经验

Percutaneous tracheostomy: one center's experience with a new modality.

作者信息

Liao Lillian, Myers John, Johnston Joe, Corneille Michael, Danielson Daren, Dent Daniel, Stewart Ronald, Pruitt Basil, Root H David, Cohn Stephen

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2005 Dec;190(6):923-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.021.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.021
PMID:16307947
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A retrospective review of our experience with percutaneous tracheostomy was performed to determine our complication rate and pattern of use since this modality was introduced at our institution.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review captured all patients in whom tracheostomy was performed or supervised by a trauma/critical care faculty member. Dates of hospital admission, ICU admission, intubation, discontinuation of mechanical ventilation, type and location of procedure, procedural complications, Injury Severity Score, charges, and patient demographics were collected. Percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) and open tracheostomy (OT) experiences were compared.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-eight tracheostomies were performed (190 OT and 178 PT). The average time to tracheostomy (TTT) for PT patients decreased from 12.7 to 7.4 days. The average TTT for OT patients remained stable at 14.0 days. The complication rate was 3.5%, with 4 complications (1.5%) associated with OT and 9 complications (5.1%) associated with PT. All complications in the PT group occurred before using a single dilator system. The 9 complications in the PT group occurred among 5 surgeons, all before their 11th attempt. PT saves 444 dollars in charges per procedure.

CONCLUSION

OT continues to be a safe method of performing tracheostomies. PT has a steep learning curve but can be mastered quickly. Benefits include a shorter time to tracheostomy, elimination of patient transport, and saving in charges. Initial PT attempts should be supervised by an experienced surgeon.

摘要

背景

自经皮气管切开术在我院开展以来,我们对其进行了回顾性研究,以确定并发症发生率及使用模式。

方法

通过回顾性病历审查,纳入所有由创伤/重症监护专业人员实施或监督气管切开术的患者。收集患者的入院日期、重症监护病房(ICU)入住日期、插管日期、机械通气停止日期、手术类型及部位、手术并发症、损伤严重程度评分、费用及患者人口统计学资料。对经皮气管切开术(PT)和开放性气管切开术(OT)的情况进行比较。

结果

共实施了368例气管切开术(190例OT和178例PT)。PT患者气管切开的平均时间(TTT)从12.7天降至7.4天。OT患者的平均TTT保持稳定,为14.0天。并发症发生率为3.5%,其中OT相关并发症4例(1.5%),PT相关并发症9例(5.1%)。PT组所有并发症均发生在使用单一扩张器系统之前。PT组的9例并发症发生在5位外科医生中,均在他们第11次尝试之前。PT每次手术可节省444美元费用。

结论

OT仍然是一种安全的气管切开术方法。PT学习曲线较陡,但可快速掌握。其优点包括气管切开时间缩短、无需转运患者及节省费用。初次进行PT尝试时应由经验丰富的外科医生监督。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous tracheostomy: one center's experience with a new modality.经皮气管切开术:一个中心对一种新方法的经验
Am J Surg. 2005 Dec;190(6):923-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.021.
2
Comparison of safety and cost of percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy.经皮气管切开术与外科气管切开术的安全性及成本比较。
Am Surg. 2001 Jan;67(1):54-60.
3
Percutaneous tracheostomy: to bronch or not to bronch--that is the question.经皮气管切开术:是否进入支气管——这是个问题。
J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1553-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823ba29e.
4
Endoscopic percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy: a prospective evaluation of 500 consecutive cases.内镜下经皮扩张气管切开术:500例连续病例的前瞻性评估。
Laryngoscope. 2005 Oct;115(10 Pt 2):1-30. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000163744.89688.E8.
5
[Fiberoptic bronchoscopy assisted percutaneous tracheostomy: report of 100 patients].[纤维支气管镜辅助经皮气管切开术:100例患者报告]
Rev Med Chil. 2008 Sep;136(9):1113-20. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
6
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: still a surgical procedure.经皮扩张气管切开术:仍然是一种外科手术。
Am Surg. 1999 Oct;65(10):982-6.
7
Tracheostomy: how and when should it be done in cardiovascular surgery ICU?气管切开术:在心血管外科重症监护病房应如何以及何时进行气管切开术?
J Card Surg. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):11-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2008.00695.x. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
8
An analysis of time and staff utilization for open versus percutaneous tracheostomies.开放手术与经皮气管切开术的时间及人员利用情况分析。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jan;128(1):109-14. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2003.18.
9
Percutaneous tracheostomy: a safe procedure in the morbidly obese.经皮气管切开术:在病态肥胖患者中是一种安全的手术。
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Apr;202(4):618-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.12.009.
10
Audit on tracheostomies performed at the General Intensive Care Unit, Kuala Lumpur Hospital.吉隆坡医院综合重症监护病房气管切开术审计
Med J Malaysia. 2003 Jun;58(2):213-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Tracheostomy in Patients Who Need Mechanical Ventilation: Early or Late? Surgical or Percutaneous? A Prospective Study in Iran.需要机械通气患者的气管切开术:早期还是晚期?外科手术还是经皮穿刺?伊朗的一项前瞻性研究。
Indian J Surg. 2017 Oct;79(5):406-411. doi: 10.1007/s12262-016-1497-7. Epub 2016 May 14.
2
Bedside Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy by Griggs Technique: A Single-Center Experience.经格里格斯技术行床边经皮扩张气管切开术:单中心经验。
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Sep 30;23:4684-4688. doi: 10.12659/msm.907006.
3
Effect of videotape for home instruction on the quality of life of tracheostomy patients: a randomized clinical trial.
家庭指导录像带对气管切开术患者生活质量的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Med Life. 2015;8(Spec Iss 4):287-294.
4
Griggs percutaneous tracheostomy without bronchoscopic guidance is a safe method: A case series of 300 patients in a tertiary care Intensive Care Unit.三级护理重症监护病房300例患者的病例系列研究:无支气管镜引导下的 Griggs经皮气管切开术是一种安全的方法
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014 Dec;18(12):778-82. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.146303.