Suppr超能文献

医院内部的创伤科主治医生:有差异吗?

In-house trauma attendings: is there a difference?

作者信息

Durham Rodney, Shapiro David, Flint Lewis

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa General Hospital, 2 Columbia Drive, Suite G417, Tampa, FL 33606, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2005 Dec;190(6):960-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.028.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Outcomes of patients who met trauma activation criteria were examined before and after implementation of in-house attending call.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Outcomes for the out-of-house period (OH) (February 1, 2001 to October 31, 2002) were compared with the in-house period (IH) (November 1, 2002 to June 30, 2004). Measures included overall mortality, length of stay (LOS) in the hospital, intensive care unit (ICU) and emergency department, and preventable deaths.

RESULTS

A total of 2,019 trauma activations were studied (1,036 OH, 983 IH). The groups were equivalent on admission. There was no difference in hospital LOS, ICU LOS, ventilator days, or overall mortality. Preventable deaths occurred in 8.1% of the OH group and in 1.0% of the IH group (P < .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Aggregate statistics and the use of surrogate markers to determine outcomes may not accurately portray the impact of attending surgeons on the quality of care. Implementation of in-house call resulted in a decreased incidence of preventable deaths.

摘要

引言

在实施院内主治医生呼叫制度前后,对符合创伤激活标准的患者的治疗结果进行了检查。

材料与方法

将院外时期(OH)(2001年2月1日至2002年10月31日)的治疗结果与院内时期(IH)(2002年11月1日至2004年6月30日)进行比较。测量指标包括总死亡率、在医院、重症监护病房(ICU)和急诊科的住院时间(LOS)以及可预防的死亡。

结果

共研究了2019例创伤激活病例(1036例OH,983例IH)。两组入院时情况相当。在医院LOS、ICU LOS、呼吸机使用天数或总死亡率方面没有差异。OH组可预防死亡发生率为8.1%,IH组为1.0%(P <.02)。

结论

汇总统计数据以及使用替代指标来确定治疗结果可能无法准确描述主治外科医生对医疗质量的影响。实施院内呼叫制度导致可预防死亡的发生率降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验