Phelan Herb A, Sperry Jason L, Friese Randall S
Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma/Critical Care, University of South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama, USA.
J Surg Res. 2007 Mar;138(1):32-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.048. Epub 2006 Dec 11.
Studies suggest that leukocytes in donated blood increase mortality and length of hospital stay (LOS) after transfusion. These studies included few trauma patients, however. Many institutions now mandate leukoreduction (LR) of transfusion products, which increases costs by approximately $30/unit. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of LR on mortality and LOS in trauma patients.
A retrospective before-and-after cohort study was conducted at a level one urban trauma center. LR of all transfusion products commenced in January 2002. All patients treated within the intervention period (March 2002 through January 2004) received LR products. Those transfused during March 2000 through January 2002 served as controls. The trauma registry was queried for patients >or=18 years who survived >or=2 days and received >or=2 units of blood. Mortality and LOS were determined for each group. Subset analysis was performed on patients receiving 2-6 transfusions and those receiving massive transfusion (>or=6 units). Mortality and LOS for control and intervention subsets were compared. Means were compared using Student's t-test, proportions using chi(2) (significance P <or= 0.05).
There were 439 patients in the control group and 240 patients in the intervention group. Groups were similar in age and mechanism of injury. There was no difference in mortality overall (P = 0.68) or after massive transfusion (P = 0.14). There was no difference in LOS overall (control, 12 +/- 17 days; intervention, 12 +/- 13.8 days, P = 0.46) or after subset analysis.
In those transfused patients who survive 48 h post-injury, LR of blood transfusion products has no beneficial impact on patient survival or hospital LOS. The associated costs of universal LR are not justified.
研究表明,献血中的白细胞会增加输血后患者的死亡率和住院时间。然而,这些研究纳入的创伤患者很少。现在许多机构都要求对输血产品进行白细胞滤除(LR),这会使成本增加约30美元/单位。本研究的目的是探讨白细胞滤除对创伤患者死亡率和住院时间的影响。
在一家一级城市创伤中心进行了一项回顾性前后队列研究。2002年1月开始对所有输血产品进行白细胞滤除。干预期间(2002年3月至2004年1月)治疗的所有患者均接受白细胞滤除后的产品。2000年3月至2002年1月期间接受输血的患者作为对照组。查询创伤登记处,获取年龄≥18岁、存活≥2天且接受≥2单位血液的患者信息。确定每组患者的死亡率和住院时间。对接受2 - 6次输血的患者和接受大量输血(≥6单位)的患者进行亚组分析。比较对照组和干预亚组的死亡率和住院时间。均值比较采用Student t检验,比例比较采用卡方检验(显著性P≤0.05)。
对照组有439例患者,干预组有240例患者。两组在年龄和损伤机制方面相似。总体死亡率(P = 0.68)或大量输血后的死亡率(P = 0.14)无差异。总体住院时间(对照组,12±17天;干预组,12±13.8天,P = 0.46)或亚组分析后住院时间均无差异。
在受伤后存活48小时的输血患者中,输血产品的白细胞滤除对患者生存或住院时间没有有益影响。普遍进行白细胞滤除的相关成本不合理。