Lewis Chad E, Hiratzka Loren F, Woods Scott E, Hendy Mary P, Engel Amy M
Department of Surgery, Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio 45220, USA.
J Card Surg. 2005 Nov-Dec;20(6):513-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2005.00137.x.
The aim of this study was to detect any outcome differences between patients who donated autologous blood versus nondonors undergoing nonemergent cardiac valve surgery. Of further interest was whether autologous donors required less allogeneic blood products overall than patients who did not donate.
We conducted a nested case-control study in which data were collected prospectively on 225 variables. Cases underwent nonemergent, cardiac valve surgery and donated autologous blood products (n = 40). Controls also had nonemergent, cardiac valve surgery but did not donate autologous blood products (n = 120). Cases were matched to controls 1:3 on age (+/-3 years), gender, and New York Heart Association Functional Classification. We controlled for 12 potential confounding variables and examined 17 outcomes of interest. To generate the unadjusted risks of each outcome, chi-square and t-tests were performed comparing cases and controls to each outcome of interest. Then logistic regression analysis investigated the adjusted risk between cases and controls and for the outcomes of interest, each controlling for the potential confounding variables.
There were no significant differences between the cases and controls for 11 of the 12 possible confounding variables. Controls had significantly more chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. There were no significant differences between cases and controls for 13 of the 17 outcomes of interest. Autologous blood donors received more total packed red blood cells (PRBCs) (p = 0.0373) and more total fresh frozen plasma than controls (p = 0.0002). Fewer autologous blood donors required allogeneic packed red blood cell transfusion (p = 0.0134), and the total length of stay was shorter for autologous donors (p = 0.0782).
Four of the 17 outcomes of interest were different for patients who donated autologous blood versus those who did not. Our experience demonstrated that elective cardiac valve surgery can safely reduce (by 18.3%) the need for allogeneic PRBCs by utilizing preoperative autologous blood donation.
本研究旨在检测接受非急诊心脏瓣膜手术的自体血捐献者与非捐献者之间的任何结局差异。另一个更受关注的问题是,自体血捐献者总体上是否比未捐献者需要更少的异体血制品。
我们进行了一项巢式病例对照研究,前瞻性收集了225个变量的数据。病例组接受非急诊心脏瓣膜手术并捐献自体血制品(n = 40)。对照组同样接受非急诊心脏瓣膜手术,但未捐献自体血制品(n = 120)。病例组与对照组按年龄(±3岁)、性别和纽约心脏协会心功能分级进行1:3匹配。我们控制了12个潜在的混杂变量,并检查了17个感兴趣的结局。为了得出每个结局的未调整风险,对病例组和对照组与每个感兴趣的结局进行卡方检验和t检验。然后进行逻辑回归分析,研究病例组和对照组之间以及感兴趣结局的调整风险,每个分析都控制了潜在的混杂变量。
12个可能的混杂变量中的11个在病例组和对照组之间无显著差异。对照组慢性阻塞性肺疾病的患病率显著更高。17个感兴趣的结局中的13个在病例组和对照组之间无显著差异。自体血捐献者接受的总浓缩红细胞(PRBC)更多(p = 0.0373),接受的总新鲜冰冻血浆也比对照组更多(p = 0.0002)。需要异体浓缩红细胞输血的自体血捐献者更少(p = 0.0134),自体血捐献者的总住院时间更短(p = 0.0782)。
在17个感兴趣的结局中,自体血捐献者与未捐献者之间有4个结局存在差异。我们的经验表明,择期心脏瓣膜手术通过术前自体血捐献可安全地减少(18.3%)异体PRBC的需求。