Dietrich Wulf, Spannagl Michael, Boehm Johannes, Hauner Katharina, Braun Siegmund, Schuster Tibor, Busley Raimund
Institute for Research in Cardiac Anesthesia, 80639 Munich, Winthirstr. 4, 80639 Munich, Germany.
Anesth Analg. 2008 Nov;107(5):1469-78. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318182252b.
Antifibrinolytics are widely used in cardiac surgery to reduce bleeding. Allogeneic blood transfusion, even in primary cardiac operations with low blood loss, is still high. In the present study we evaluated the impact of tranexamic acid compared to aprotinin on the transfusion incidence in cardiac surgical patients with low risk of bleeding.
This prospective, randomized, double-blind study included 220 patients undergoing primary coronary artery revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) or aortic valve replacement (AVR). Randomized in blocks of 20, patients received either tranexamic acid (approximately 6 g) or full-dose aprotinin (approximately 5-6 x 10(6) Kallikrein Inhibiting Units). Transfusion was guided by a strict transfusion algorithm. Molecular markers of hemostasis were determined to assess differences in the mode of action of the two drugs. Primary end-points were the incidence of allogeneic red cell transfusion and 24-h postoperative blood loss. Data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle and compared using the chi(2) and Mann-Whitney U-test.
Two-hundred-twenty patients were enrolled (CABG: 134, AVR: 86). In the aprotinin Group 47% of patients received allogeneic blood during the hospital stay as compared to 61% in the tranexamic acid group (P = 0.036). Aprotinin conferred a 23% reduction in allogeneic transfusion risk (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.53-0.88). Overall, no significant difference in postoperative bleeding was observed, although 24-h blood loss was reduced in aprotinin-treated CABG patients (500, 350-750 mL vs 650, 475-875 mL (median, 25th-75th percentile); P = 0.039). Despite the lower transfusion rate, the hemoglobin concentration on the first postoperative day was higher in the aprotinin group (11.3, 9.9-12.1 vs 10.6, 9.9-11.6 mg/dL; P = 0.023). The fibrinolytic activity at the end of operation determined by D-Dimer was comparable in both groups. (0.15, 0.11-0.17 mg/L [aprotinin] versus 0.18, 0.12-0.24 mg/L [tranexamic acid]). The activated partial thromboplastin time was prolonged up to 4 h postoperatively in the aprotinin group, while the heparin requirement was reduced: 19% of the patients in the aprotinin group and 45% in the tranexamic acid group received at least one additional bolus heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass (P < 0.001). Troponin T levels postoperatively and on postoperative day 1 were significantly higher in the tranexamic acid group (P = 0.017). No differences in renal, cardiac, or mortality outcomes were observed.
Considering the rate of transfusion of red blood cells, tranexamic acid was slightly inferior in patients undergoing CABG, but there was no difference in patients receiving AVR. Tranexamic acid seems to be less effective in operations with increased bleeding such as CABG. Clinical benefit depends on specific patient and institution characteristics (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00396760).
抗纤溶药物广泛应用于心脏手术以减少出血。即便在失血较少的初次心脏手术中,异体输血率仍然很高。在本研究中,我们评估了氨甲环酸与抑肽酶相比,对出血风险较低的心脏手术患者输血发生率的影响。
这项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究纳入了220例行初次冠状动脉血运重建术(冠状动脉旁路移植术[CABG])或主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的患者。患者按20人一组进行随机分组,分别接受氨甲环酸(约6 g)或全剂量抑肽酶(约5 - 6×10⁶激肽释放酶抑制单位)。输血遵循严格的输血算法。测定止血的分子标志物以评估两种药物作用方式的差异。主要终点是异体红细胞输血发生率和术后24小时失血量。数据根据意向性分析原则进行分析,并使用卡方检验和曼 - 惠特尼U检验进行比较。
共纳入220例患者(CABG:134例,AVR:86例)。在抑肽酶组中,47%的患者在住院期间接受了异体输血,而氨甲环酸组为61%(P = 0.036)。抑肽酶使异体输血风险降低了23%(相对危险度0.77,95%可信区间0.53 - 0.88)。总体而言,术后出血未见显著差异,尽管抑肽酶治疗的CABG患者24小时失血量减少(500,350 - 750 mL对比650,475 - 875 mL(中位数,第25 - 75百分位数);P = 0.039)。尽管输血率较低,但术后第1天抑肽酶组的血红蛋白浓度较高(11.3,9.9 - 12.1对比10.6,9.9 - 11.6 mg/dL;P = 0.023)。通过D - 二聚体测定的手术结束时的纤溶活性在两组中相当。(0.15,0.11 - 0.17 mg/L[抑肽酶]对比0.18,0.12 - 0.24 mg/L[氨甲环酸])。抑肽酶组术后活化部分凝血活酶时间延长至4小时,而肝素需求量减少:抑肽酶组19%的患者和氨甲环酸组45%的患者在体外循环期间至少额外接受了一次肝素推注(P < 0.001)。氨甲环酸组术后及术后第1天的肌钙蛋白T水平显著更高(P = 0.017)。在肾脏、心脏或死亡率结局方面未观察到差异。
考虑到红细胞输血率,氨甲环酸在接受CABG的患者中略逊一筹,但在接受AVR的患者中无差异。氨甲环酸在如CABG这种出血增加的手术中似乎效果较差。临床获益取决于特定的患者和机构特征(ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00396760)。