基督教传统中的人类胚胎：重新审视
The human embryo in the Christian tradition: a reconsideration.
作者信息
Jones D A
机构信息
St Mary's College, Waldegrave Road, Strawberry Hill, Twickenham, TW1 4SX, UK.
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 2005 Dec;31(12):710-3. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.011593.
Abstract
Recent claims that the Christian tradition justifies destructive research on human embryos have drawn upon an article by the late Professor Gordon Dunstan which appeared in this journal in 1984. Despite its undoubted influence, this article was flawed and seriously misrepresented the tradition of Christian reflection on the moral status of the human embryo.
摘要
最近有人声称基督教传统为对人类胚胎进行破坏性研究提供了正当理由，这一说法借鉴了已故的戈登·邓斯坦教授1984年发表在本杂志上的一篇文章。尽管这篇文章有毋庸置疑的影响力，但它存在缺陷，严重歪曲了基督教对人类胚胎道德地位的反思传统。
相似文献
1
The human embryo in the Christian tradition: a reconsideration.基督教传统中的人类胚胎：重新审视
J Med Ethics. 2005 Dec;31(12):710-3. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.011593.
2
Moral knowledge: some reflections on moral controversies, incompatible moral epistemologies, and the culture wars.道德知识：关于道德争议、不相容的道德认识论及文化战争的若干思考
Christ Bioeth. 2004 Jan-Apr;10(1):79-103. doi: 10.1080/13803600490489979.
3
Response to: the human embryo in the Christian tradition.回应：基督教传统中的人类胚胎。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Dec;31(12):713-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.012153.
4
5
The embryo and the fetus: new moral contexts.胚胎与胎儿：新的道德背景。
Theol Stud. 1993 Mar;54(1):124-42.
6
What the Supreme Court didn't know: ancient and early Christian views on abortion.最高法院所不知道的：古代及早期基督教对堕胎的看法。
Hum Life Rev. 1975 Spring;1(2):5-21.
7
8
The potentiality argument in the debate relating to the beginning of personhood.关于人格起始问题辩论中的潜在性论证。
Hum Reprod Genet Ethics. 2000;6(2):19-26. doi: 10.1179/hrge.6.2.y4v1p37874v42181.
9
Is the human embryo our neighbour?人类胚胎是我们的邻居吗？
Ethics Med. 2000;16(2):57-60.
10
Physician-assisted death: doctrinal develoment vs. Christian tradition.医生协助自杀：教义发展与基督教传统
Christ Bioeth. 1998 Aug;4(2):115-21. doi: 10.1076/chbi.4.2.115.6909.
引用本文的文献
1
Conception of Saviour Siblings: Religious Views in Malaysia.救世主同胞的概念：马来西亚的宗教观点
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2022 Sep 3;14(4):363-377. doi: 10.1007/s41649-022-00216-3. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Divergent views on abortion and the period of ensoulment.关于堕胎和灵魂赋予时期的不同观点。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2013 Feb;13(1):26-31. doi: 10.12816/0003192. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
3
Reinterpreting the 'quickening' perspective in the abortion debate.重新审视堕胎辩论中的“胎动初觉”观点。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2009;30(2):161-71. doi: 10.1007/s11017-009-9102-8. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
本文引用的文献
1
2
Aquinas and the presence of the human rational soul in the early embryo.
Thomist. 1992 Jan;56(1):19-48. doi: 10.1353/tho.1992.0044.
3
The moral status of the human embryo: a tradition recalled.人类胚胎的道德地位：一种被忆起的传统。
J Med Ethics. 1984 Mar;10(1):38-44. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.1.38.
Zotero 插件