• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A surrealistic mega-analysis of redisorganization theories.对重组理论的超现实元分析。
J R Soc Med. 2005 Dec;98(12):563-8. doi: 10.1177/014107680509801223.
2
A surrealistic mega-analysis of redisorganization theories.对重组理论的超现实元分析。
Healthc Q. 2006;9(3):50-4. doi: 10.12927/hcq..18228.
3
Ethics committees: is reform in order?
Med J Aust. 1999 Jan 4;170(1):9-10. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb126855.x.
4
Redisorganization theories.重组理论。
J R Soc Med. 2006 Mar;99(3):105-6. doi: 10.1177/014107680609900307.
5
A descriptive study of healthcare ethics consultants in Canada: results of a national survey.加拿大医疗保健伦理顾问的描述性研究:一项全国性调查的结果
HEC Forum. 1993 May;5(3):144-64. doi: 10.1007/BF01463890.
6
Ethics committees, principles and consequences.伦理委员会、原则与后果。
J Med Ethics. 1998 Apr;24(2):81-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.2.81.
7
Hospital ethics committees in practice: the case review function of four HECs in Connecticut.实际运作中的医院伦理委员会:康涅狄格州四个医院伦理委员会的案例审查职能
HEC Forum. 1994 Mar;6(2):73-84. doi: 10.1007/BF01463221.
8
The impact of market-based 'reform' on cultural values in health care.基于市场的“改革”对医疗保健文化价值观的影响。
Semin Nurse Manag. 1999 Dec;7(4):198-202.
9
The interactions of Canadian ethics consultants with health care managers and governing boards during times of crisis.加拿大伦理顾问在危机时期与医疗保健管理人员及管理委员会的互动。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):128-136. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1260664. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Reforming the culture of healthcare: the case for intelligent kindness.改革医疗保健文化:明智的善意之举
BJPsych Bull. 2015 Feb;39(1):1-5. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.114.047449.
2
GP commissioning: will it save money and raise standards of care?全科医生委托服务:它能省钱并提高医疗服务标准吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Jul;62(600):380-3. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X652508.
3
'Sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans everything:' resourcing mental health services for older people.“没有牙齿,没有眼睛,没有味觉,没有一切:”为老年人提供心理健康服务。
J R Soc Med. 2012 Apr;105(4):146-50. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2012.120008.
4
Healthy people, healthy lives. The English public health white paper: risks and challenges for a new public health system.健康人群,健康生活。英国公共卫生白皮书:新公共卫生体系面临的风险与挑战。
Clin Med (Lond). 2011 Oct;11(5):430-3. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-5-430.
5
'A really useful editorial'.一篇非常有用的社论。
Clin Med (Lond). 2011 Feb;11(1):3-4. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-1-3.
6
Lessons from the evaluation of the UK's NHS R&D implementation methods programme.英国国家医疗服务体系研发实施方法项目评估的经验教训。
Implement Sci. 2007 Feb 19;2:7. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-7.
7
A retrospectroscopic overview of political/administrative intrusion--is a 'patients' revolt' not now indicated?对政治/行政干预的回顾性概述——现在难道不需要一场“患者反抗”吗?
J R Soc Med. 2006 Jul;99(7):377-8. doi: 10.1177/014107680609900727.
8
Redisorganization theories.重组理论。
J R Soc Med. 2006 Mar;99(3):105-6. doi: 10.1177/014107680609900307.

本文引用的文献

1
The OFF theory of research utilization.研究利用的“脱离”理论
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;58(2):113-6; discussion 117-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.002.
2
HARLOT plc: an amalgamation of the world's two oldest professions.哈洛特股份有限公司:世界上最古老的两种职业的融合。
BMJ. 2003 Dec 20;327(7429):1442-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7429.1442.
3
The "redisorganisation" of the NHS.英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的“重组”
BMJ. 2001 Dec 1;323(7324):1262-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7324.1262.

对重组理论的超现实元分析。

A surrealistic mega-analysis of redisorganization theories.

作者信息

Oxman Andrew D, Sackett David L, Chalmers Iain, Prescott Trine E

机构信息

Norwegian Centre for Health Services Research, Pb 7004, St Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J R Soc Med. 2005 Dec;98(12):563-8. doi: 10.1177/014107680509801223.

DOI:10.1177/014107680509801223
PMID:16319441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1299350/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We are sick and tired of being redisorganized.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the empirical evidence for organizational theories and repeated reorganizations.

METHODS

We did not find anything worth reading, other than Dilbert, so we fantasized. Unfortunately, our fantasies may well resemble many people's realities. We are sorry about this, but it is not our fault.

RESULTS

We discovered many reasons for repeated reorganizations, the most common being "no good reason". We estimated that trillions of dollars are being spent on strategic and organizational planning activities each year, thus providing lots of good reasons for hundreds of thousands of people, including us, to get into the business. New leaders who are intoxicated with the prospect of change further fuel perpetual cycles of redisorganization. We identified eight indicators of successful redisorganizations, including large consultancy fees paid to friends and relatives.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose the establishment of ethics committees to review all future redisorganization proposals in order to put a stop to uncontrolled, unplanned experimentation inflicted on providers and users of the health services.

摘要

背景

我们已经厌倦了一次次的重组。

目的

系统回顾组织理论和反复重组的实证证据。

方法

除了《呆伯特》,我们没找到任何值得一读的东西,所以我们就幻想了一番。不幸的是,我们的幻想很可能与许多人的现实情况相似。对此我们很抱歉,但这不是我们的错。

结果

我们发现了反复重组的许多原因,最常见的是“没有充分理由”。我们估计每年在战略和组织规划活动上花费数万亿美元,这就为包括我们在内的数十万人涉足这一行业提供了很多充分理由。热衷于变革前景的新领导者进一步助长了无休止的重组循环。我们确定了成功重组的八个指标,包括支付给亲朋好友的高额咨询费。

结论

我们提议设立伦理委员会,以审查未来所有的重组提议,从而制止对医疗服务提供者和使用者进行的无节制、无计划的试验。