Evaluation of 3 methods of whole-genome amplification for subsequent metaphase comparative genomic hybridization.

A common aim in cancer research is to investigate mechanisms of malignant progression by genetic analysis of key stages, including pre-malignancy, microinvasion, and micrometastases. As such lesions are small and require microdissection from clinical samples, the amount of DNA that can be recovered is limited and frequently inadequate for commonly used techniques of genomic analysis, such as comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). There is a critical requirement for techniques of whole-genome amplification that minimize representation bias in the amplified sample. Several techniques have been described, although their relative suitability for CGH has not been examined adequately. Here we compare the abilities of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR (DOP-PCR), multiple-strand displacement amplification (MDA), and balanced PCR accurately to amplify limited amounts of template DNA for use in CGH. Amplification by DOP-PCR and MDA, but not balanced PCR faithfully preserved the original genomic content following amplification, as evidenced by generally concordant CGH copy number karyograms. Whereas the amplification products of DOP-PCR were immediately available for labeling and hybridization, the products of MDA required a further digestion step to produce optimal-sized probes for CGH. Moreover, MDA was less reliable overall than DOP-PCR at the lowest starting amount of 10 pg of template DNA. We conclude that DOP-PCR is the method of choice for whole-genome amplification of minute quantities of DNA to enable global genomic analysis to be performed on limited clinical samples.