Al-Shekhlee Amer, Fernandes Filho Jose A, Sukul Devraj, Preston David C
Department of Neurology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Ohio 44106-5040, USA.
Muscle Nerve. 2006 Feb;33(2):289-93. doi: 10.1002/mus.20488.
The lumbrical-interossei comparison study is commonly employed in the electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Placement of the recording electrodes relies on anatomic landmarks as the muscles being recorded cannot be seen or palpated. To determine the optimal active electrode location, 15 controls and 5 patients were studied using a grid of 12 electrodes placed over the lateral palm. Amplitudes, rise-times, and latencies of the responses at each location were measured. The lowest control latency difference was located in the lateral mid-proximal palm (mean 0 ms, upper range of 0.5 ms). This location also had the highest lumbrical amplitude and rise-time. More distal in the palm, the mean latency difference increased to 0.5 ms with an upper range of 0.9 ms. When performing the lumbrical-interossei comparison study, it is essential to place the active recording electrode in the optimal location. Failure to do so will result in an increased number of false-positive studies.
蚓状肌-骨间肌比较研究常用于腕管综合征的电诊断。记录电极的放置依赖于解剖标志,因为被记录的肌肉无法看到或触及。为了确定最佳的活动电极位置,对15名对照者和5名患者进行了研究,在手掌外侧放置了一个由12个电极组成的网格。测量了每个位置的反应幅度、上升时间和潜伏期。最低的对照潜伏期差异位于手掌外侧近端中部(平均0毫秒,上限0.5毫秒)。该位置的蚓状肌幅度和上升时间也最高。在手掌更远端,平均潜伏期差异增加到0.5毫秒,上限为0.9毫秒。在进行蚓状肌-骨间肌比较研究时,将活动记录电极放置在最佳位置至关重要。否则将导致假阳性研究数量增加。