Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
States take aim at caps.各州将矛头指向了上限。
Med Econ. 2005 Oct 21;82(20):40-4.
2
State liability reform trends: caps up, alternatives abound.国家责任改革趋势：上限提高，替代方案众多。
Bull Am Coll Surg. 2004 Nov;89(11):17-20.
3
Consumer deductibles: how to distribute more equitably the risks of medical malpractice and compensate victims adequately without statutory damage caps.消费者免赔额：如何在没有法定损害赔偿上限的情况下更公平地分配医疗事故风险并充分补偿受害者。
Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J. 2006 Summer;41(4):1141-61.
4
Have state caps on malpractice awards increased the supply of physicians?对医疗事故赔偿设定州上限是否增加了医生的供给？
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-250-W5-258. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.250.
5
6
7
Are medical malpractice damages caps constitutional? An overview of state litigation.医疗事故损害赔偿限额是否符合宪法？对各州诉讼情况的概述。
J Law Med Ethics. 2005 Fall;33(3):515-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00515.x.
8
Worried in Wisconsin. With damage cap scrapped, panel will study options.威斯康星州忧心忡忡。随着损害赔偿上限被取消，专门小组将研究各种选择。
Mod Healthc. 2005 Aug 22;35(34):56.
9
Medical mutual's perspective on the 2005 session.医疗互助组织对2005年会议的看法。
Md Med. 2005 Spring;6(2):32.
10
Pa. malpractice reforms could set the pace for other states.宾夕法尼亚州的医疗事故改革可能为其他州树立榜样。
Physician Exec. 2003 May-Jun;29(3):30-2.
Zotero 插件