Müjdeci Arzu, Gökay Osman
Ankara Universitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, 06500-Beşevler, Ankara, Turkey.
Am J Dent. 2005 Oct;18(5):323-6.
To evaluate the effects of two bleaching gels and two whitening strips on surface hardness of four resin composites in vitro.
60 cylindrical samples of each composite (Surefil, Charisma, Admira, Flowline) were prepared (4 mm thickness and 6 mm diameter) and stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. These samples were randomly divided into six test groups (n=10). One group was selected for baseline and Vickers microhardness measurements (load= 100 g, dwell time 20 seconds) were taken immediately. The other groups were treated for 21 days with one of the following: distilled water (control), containing 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching gel (Perfect Bleach), 16% carbamide peroxide bleaching gel (Viva Style), 5.3% hydrogen peroxide whitening strips (Crest Whitestrips) and 14% hydrogen peroxide whitening strips (Crest Whitestrips Supreme). The treated samples were also subsequently subjected to the same microhardness testing by using the same method as applied to the baseline measurements. Data were analyzed statistically (alpha = 0.05).
Overall, the lowest surface hardness value was observed in baseline measurements. An increase in surface hardness was noted in all of the other groups. The higher surface hardness values were found in control, whitening strip (5.3% HP) and bleaching gel (10% CP) groups than whitening strip (14% HP) group. Bleaching gel (16% CP) was statistically different from only baseline measurements. In addition, regardless of the tested groups, statistically significant differences in surface hardness were observed between composite materials. Surefil showed the highest hardness values while Flowline presented the lowest hardness values.
在体外评估两种漂白凝胶和两种美白牙贴对四种树脂复合材料表面硬度的影响。
制备每种复合材料(Surefil、Charisma、Admira、Flowline)的60个圆柱形样本(厚度4毫米,直径6毫米),并在37摄氏度的蒸馏水中储存24小时。这些样本被随机分为六个测试组(n = 10)。选择一组进行基线测量,并立即进行维氏显微硬度测量(载荷 = 100克,保压时间20秒)。其他组用以下其中一种处理21天:蒸馏水(对照组)、含10%过氧化脲的漂白凝胶(Perfect Bleach)、含16%过氧化脲的漂白凝胶(Viva Style)、含5.3%过氧化氢的美白牙贴(佳洁士美白牙贴)和含14%过氧化氢的美白牙贴(佳洁士极致美白牙贴)。处理后的样本随后也采用与基线测量相同的方法进行相同的显微硬度测试。对数据进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。
总体而言,在基线测量中观察到最低的表面硬度值。其他所有组的表面硬度均有增加。对照组、美白牙贴(5.3% HP)组和漂白凝胶(10% CP)组的表面硬度值高于美白牙贴(14% HP)组。漂白凝胶(16% CP)仅与基线测量在统计学上有差异。此外,无论测试组如何,复合材料之间在表面硬度上均观察到统计学上的显著差异。Surefil显示出最高的硬度值,而Flowline呈现出最低的硬度值。