Moritz Anton, Ozaslan Feyzan, Dogan Selami, Abdel-Rahman Ulf, Aybek Tayfun, Wimmer-Greinecker Gerhard
The Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
J Interv Cardiol. 2005 Dec;18(6):523-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2005.00095.x.
Surgeons look back on 57 years of experience in the closure of atrial septal defects (ASDs) and 46 years in the closure of ventricular septal defects (VSDs). The transcatheter approaches to repair ASDs started first in the 1980s and for VSDs 8 years later. This study sought to reveal the surgical features only given by the surgical therapy and the limitation of interventional ASD and VSD closure. A variety of surgical techniques including the minimal invasive techniques for ASD or VSD closure are well described in recent publication with good results. The surgical trend is to improve the cosmetic outcome by minimizing the size of skin incision. The latest robotically assisted technique requires only four stab wound incisions. New techniques and devices have revolutionized the transcatheter technique but could not achieve the surgical ability to close all types of ASD or VSD, control arrhythmias, and correct additional valve disease or malformation. The mortality for interventional and surgical procedures approaches zero in recent publication. The residual shunting after surgical closure of ASD varies from 2% to 7.8% versus 5% to 33% after interventional closure. General complications caused by the surgical procedure are negligible; however, the shortness of hospital stay and the cosmetic appeal is an advantage of interventional ASD closure. There is no scientific comparison of surgical vs. interventional VSD closure yet.
外科医生回顾了57年房间隔缺损(ASD)闭合手术经验以及46年室间隔缺损(VSD)闭合手术经验。经导管修复ASD的方法始于20世纪80年代,修复VSD的方法则在8年后开始。本研究旨在揭示仅通过手术治疗所呈现的手术特征以及介入性ASD和VSD闭合的局限性。包括用于ASD或VSD闭合的微创技术在内的多种手术技术在近期出版物中有详尽描述且效果良好。手术趋势是通过最小化皮肤切口大小来改善美观效果。最新的机器人辅助技术仅需四个微小切口。新技术和设备彻底改变了经导管技术,但无法达到手术闭合所有类型ASD或VSD、控制心律失常以及纠正其他瓣膜疾病或畸形的能力。近期出版物中,介入手术和外科手术的死亡率均接近零。ASD手术闭合后的残余分流率为2%至7.8%,而介入闭合后为5%至33%。手术所致的一般并发症可忽略不计;然而,住院时间短和美观是介入性ASD闭合的优势。目前尚无关于外科手术与介入性VSD闭合的科学比较。