Gentili R, Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T
INSERM/ERM207 Motricité-Plasticité, Université de Bourgogne, U.F.R S.T.A.P.S, Campus Universitaire, B.P. 27877, 21078 Dijon, France.
Neuroscience. 2006 Feb;137(3):761-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.10.013. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
This study compares the improvement and generalization of arm motor performance after physical or mental training in a motor task requiring a speed-accuracy tradeoff. During the pre- and post-training sessions, 40 subjects pointed with their right arm as accurately and as fast as possible toward targets placed in the frontal plane. Arm movements were performed in two different workspaces called right and left paths. During the training sessions, which included only the right path, subjects were divided into four training groups (n = 10): (i) the physical group, subjects overtly performed the task; (ii) the mental group, subjects imagined themselves performing the task; (iii) the active control group, subjects performed eye movements through the targets, (iv) the passive control group, subjects did not receive any specific training. We recorded movement duration, peak acceleration and electromyographic signals from arm muscles. Our findings showed that after both physical and mental training on the right path (training path), hand movement duration and peak acceleration respectively decreased and increased for this path. However, motor performance improvement was greater after physical compared with mental practice. Interestingly, we also observed a partial learning generalization, namely an enhancement of motor performance for the left path (non-training path). The amount of this generalization was roughly similar for the physical and mental groups. Furthermore, while arm muscle activity progressively increased during the training period for the physical group, the activity of the same muscles for the mental group was unchanged and comparable with that of the rest condition. Control groups did not exhibit any improvement. These findings put forward the idea that mental training facilitates motor learning and allows its partial transfer to nearby workspaces. They further suggest that motor prediction, a common process during both actual and imagined movements, is a fundamental operation for both sensorimotor control and learning.
本研究比较了在一项需要权衡速度与准确性的运动任务中,进行身体训练或心理训练后,手臂运动表现的改善情况及泛化能力。在训练前和训练后的阶段,40名受试者用右臂尽可能准确且快速地指向位于额平面的目标。手臂运动在两个不同的工作空间中进行,分别称为右路径和左路径。在仅包括右路径的训练阶段,受试者被分为四个训练组(n = 10):(i)身体训练组,受试者公开执行任务;(ii)心理训练组,受试者想象自己执行任务;(iii)主动对照组,受试者通过目标进行眼球运动;(iv)被动对照组,受试者未接受任何特定训练。我们记录了运动持续时间、峰值加速度以及手臂肌肉的肌电信号。我们的研究结果表明,在右路径(训练路径)上进行身体训练和心理训练后,该路径上手部运动持续时间分别缩短,峰值加速度增加。然而,与心理练习相比,身体练习后运动表现的改善更大。有趣的是,我们还观察到了部分学习泛化,即在左路径(非训练路径)上运动表现有所增强。身体训练组和心理训练组的这种泛化程度大致相似。此外,虽然身体训练组在训练期间手臂肌肉活动逐渐增加,但心理训练组相同肌肉的活动没有变化,且与休息状态时相当。对照组没有表现出任何改善。这些发现提出了这样一种观点,即心理训练有助于运动学习,并使其部分转移到附近的工作空间。它们进一步表明,运动预测是实际运动和想象运动中共同的过程,是感觉运动控制和学习的基本操作。