Mader D H
University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Homosex. 2005;49(3-4):377-420. doi: 10.1300/j082v49n03_14.
The Uranians comprised a loosely knit group of British and American homosexual poets writing between approximately 1880 and 1930, sharing a number of basic cultural and literary assumptions derived on one hand from Walter Pater, and on the other from Walt Whitman. Although they used Oriental, Christian and other motifs, one of the major elements many shared was a use of various allusions and themes from ancient Greece, including paganism, male companionship or intimate friendship (which was not defined in terms of sameness), and democracy and a natural aristocracy of virtue, which they applied to the concerns of their own society and era. The model of male relationships which they advocated (and in at least some cases practiced) was almost uniformly asymmetrical, either by age or class, or both. In addition to their poetry, various theoretical writings by members of the group are also involved in the discussion, and this article argues that these historical/ literary allusions and themes should not be understood as means of evasion which allowed them to write of tabooed subjects safely, but as part of a consciously adopted artistic/cultural strategy for homosexual emancipation. It also suggests that their arguments should be reexamined as a corrective to the present egalitarian model of homosexuality.
“乌拉尼亚派”由一群松散的英美同性恋诗人组成,他们活跃于大约1880年至1930年间,有着一些共同的基本文化和文学观念,一方面源于沃尔特·佩特,另一方面源于沃尔特·惠特曼。尽管他们运用了东方、基督教及其他主题,但许多人共有的一个主要元素是对古希腊各种典故和主题的运用,包括异教、男性陪伴或亲密友谊(并非以相同性来定义),以及民主和自然的美德贵族制,他们将这些应用于自身所处社会和时代所关切的问题。他们所倡导的(并且至少在某些情况下践行的)男性关系模式几乎无一例外地是不对称的,要么基于年龄,要么基于阶层,或者两者皆有。除了他们的诗歌,该团体成员的各种理论著作也被纳入讨论范围,本文认为这些历史/文学典故和主题不应被理解为一种逃避手段,使他们能够安全地书写禁忌主题,而应被视为同性恋解放的一种自觉采用的艺术/文化策略的一部分。文章还表明,他们的观点应被重新审视,以纠正当前同性恋的平等主义模式。