Finckh A, Simard J F, Gabay C, Guerne P-A
Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Jun;65(6):746-52. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.045062. Epub 2005 Dec 8.
Acquired drug resistance or gradual drug failure has been described with most disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and is also starting to be recognised with anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents.
To study acquired drug resistance to anti-TNF agents in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Swiss health authorities requested continuous monitoring of patients receiving biological agents. Intensification of co-therapy with traditional DMARDs, gradual dose escalation, and drug discontinuation rates in all patients receiving infliximab, etanercept, or adalimumab, adjusting for potential confounders, were analysed. Intensification of DMARD co-therapy and time to discontinuation of the three anti-TNF agents were analysed using a proportional hazards models. Dose escalation and evolution of RA disease activity (DAS28) were analysed using a longitudinal regression model.
1198 patients contributing 1450 patient-years of anti-TNF treatment met the inclusion criteria. The rate of intensification of traditional DMARD co-therapy over time was significantly higher with infliximab (hazards ratio = 1.73 (99% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 to 2.51)) than with the two other agents. Infliximab also showed significant dose escalation over time, with an average dose increase of +12% (99% CI 8% to 16%) after 1 year, and +18% (99% CI 11% to 25%) after 2 years. No significant differences in discontinuation rates were seen between the three anti-TNF agents (ANOVA, p = 0.67). Evolution of disease activity over time indicated a lower therapeutic response to infliximab (DAS28, p<0.001) compared with etanercept, after 6 months' treatment.
In this population, infliximab was associated with a higher risk of requiring intensification of DMARD co-therapy than the other anti-TNF agents and a significant dose escalation over time. Analysis of RA disease activity indicated a reduced therapeutic response to infliximab after the first 6 months of treatment, suggestive of acquired drug resistance.
大多数改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs)都出现过获得性耐药或逐渐出现药物失效的情况,抗肿瘤坏死因子(抗TNF)药物也开始出现这种情况。
研究类风湿关节炎(RA)患者对抗TNF药物的获得性耐药情况。
瑞士卫生当局要求持续监测接受生物制剂治疗的患者。分析了所有接受英夫利昔单抗、依那西普或阿达木单抗治疗的患者中,传统DMARDs联合治疗的强化情况、剂量逐渐增加情况以及停药率,并对潜在混杂因素进行了校正。使用比例风险模型分析DMARDs联合治疗的强化情况和三种抗TNF药物的停药时间。使用纵向回归模型分析剂量增加情况和类风湿关节炎疾病活动度(DAS28)的变化。
1198例接受抗TNF治疗达1450患者年的患者符合纳入标准。随着时间的推移,英夫利昔单抗组传统DMARDs联合治疗强化率显著高于其他两种药物(风险比=1.73(99%置信区间(CI)1.19至2.51))。英夫利昔单抗随着时间的推移也出现显著的剂量增加,1年后平均剂量增加+12%(99%CI 8%至16%),2年后增加+18%(99%CI 11%至25%)。三种抗TNF药物的停药率未见显著差异(方差分析,p=0.67)。治疗6个月后,与依那西普相比,随着时间的推移,疾病活动度变化表明英夫利昔单抗的治疗反应较低(DAS28,p<0.001)。
在该人群中,与其他抗TNF药物相比,英夫利昔单抗需要强化DMARDs联合治疗的风险更高,且随着时间的推移剂量显著增加。类风湿关节炎疾病活动度分析表明,治疗前6个月后英夫利昔单抗的治疗反应降低,提示存在获得性耐药。