• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)基因突变携带者的长期随访:筛查依从性及对咨询和筛查程序的满意度

Long term follow-up of HNPCC gene mutation carriers: compliance with screening and satisfaction with counseling and screening procedures.

作者信息

Wagner Anja, van Kessel Ingrid, Kriege Mieke G, Tops Carli M J, Wijnen Juul Th, Vasen Hans F A, van der Meer Conny A, van Oostrom Iris I H, Meijers-Heijboer Hanne

机构信息

Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Westzeedijk 112-114, AH Rotterdam, 3016, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Fam Cancer. 2005;4(4):295-300. doi: 10.1007/s10689-005-0658-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10689-005-0658-9
PMID:16341806
Abstract

Hereditary non polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is a hereditary predisposition to colorectal and endometrial cancer, caused by mutations of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MSH2, MLH1 and MSH6. Regular colonoscopy reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer in mutation carriers dramatically. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of colonoscopy by proven HNPCC mutation carriers. We also evaluated the satisfaction with the counseling and screening procedures at the long term. A questionnaire survey was performed among 94 proven MMR gene mutation carriers. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. The average time of follow-up was 3,5 years (range 0.5-8.5 years). The response rate was 74%. The proportion of unaffected mutation carriers under colonoscopic screening increased from 31 to 88% upon genetic testing, and for gynecological screening from 17 to 69%. However, more than half of the responders experienced colonoscopy as unpleasant or painful. About 97% felt well informed during counseling, and 88% felt sufficiently supported. Ten percent of the responders reported a high cancer worry that was significantly (P = 0.007) associated with a high perceived cancer risk. Six responders (9%) regretted being tested. Remarkably, of 4 of these 6 a close relative died recently of cancer. Problems with obtaining a disability or life insurance or mortgage were experienced by 4 out 10 healthy carriers opting for these services. In conclusion, genetic testing for HNPCC considerably improves compliance for screening, which will result in a reduction of HNPCC-related cancer morbidity and mortality in mutation carriers. Most HNPCC gene mutation carriers cope well with their cancer susceptibility on the long term.

摘要

遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)是一种结直肠癌和子宫内膜癌的遗传易感性疾病,由错配修复(MMR)基因MSH2、MLH1和MSH6的突变引起。定期结肠镜检查可显著降低突变携带者患结直肠癌的发生率。本研究的目的是评估已证实的HNPCC突变携带者对结肠镜检查的使用情况。我们还评估了长期对咨询和筛查程序的满意度。对94名已证实的MMR基因突变携带者进行了问卷调查。使用单变量和多变量分析对数据进行分析。平均随访时间为3.5年(范围0.5 - 8.5年)。应答率为74%。在结肠镜筛查中,未受影响的突变携带者比例从基因检测前的31%增加到88%,妇科筛查的比例从17%增加到69%。然而,超过一半的应答者认为结肠镜检查不愉快或痛苦。约97%的人在咨询过程中感觉信息充分,88%的人感觉得到了充分支持。10%的应答者报告有高度的癌症担忧,这与高感知癌症风险显著相关(P = 0.007)。6名应答者(9%)后悔进行了检测。值得注意的是,这6人中的4人有近亲最近死于癌症。在选择这些服务的10名健康携带者中,有4人遇到了获得残疾、人寿保险或抵押贷款方面的问题。总之,HNPCC的基因检测显著提高了筛查的依从性,这将降低突变携带者中与HNPCC相关的癌症发病率和死亡率。大多数HNPCC基因突变携带者长期能很好地应对其癌症易感性。

相似文献

1
Long term follow-up of HNPCC gene mutation carriers: compliance with screening and satisfaction with counseling and screening procedures.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)基因突变携带者的长期随访:筛查依从性及对咨询和筛查程序的满意度
Fam Cancer. 2005;4(4):295-300. doi: 10.1007/s10689-005-0658-9.
2
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: diagnostic strategies and their implications.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌:诊断策略及其影响。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 May(150):1-180.
3
Colon cancer screening practices following genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) mutations.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)突变基因检测后的结肠癌筛查实践。
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Sep 27;164(17):1881-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.17.1881.
4
Screening and preventive behaviors one year after predictive genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌预测性基因检测一年后的筛查与预防行为
Cancer. 2005 Jul 15;104(2):273-81. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21183.
5
Compliance and Satisfaction with Long-Term Surveillance in Finnish HNPCC Families.芬兰遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)家系对长期监测的依从性和满意度
Fam Cancer. 2006;5(2):175-8. doi: 10.1007/s10689-005-5442-3.
6
MSH2 mutation carriers are at higher risk of cancer than MLH1 mutation carriers: a study of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families.与错配修复基因1(MLH1)突变携带者相比,错配修复基因2(MSH2)突变携带者患癌风险更高:一项遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌家族研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Oct 15;19(20):4074-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.20.4074.
7
Lower incidence of colorectal cancer and later age of disease onset in 27 families with pathogenic MSH6 germline mutations compared with families with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations: the German Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Consortium.与携带MLH1或MSH2突变的家族相比,27个携带致病性MSH6种系突变的家族中结直肠癌发病率较低且发病年龄较晚:德国遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌联盟
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Nov 15;22(22):4486-94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.02.033. Epub 2004 Oct 13.
8
Immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing for selecting MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutation carriers in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.免疫组织化学和微卫星不稳定性检测用于遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌中MLH1、MSH2和MSH6突变携带者的筛选。
Oncol Rep. 2004 Sep;12(3):621-9.
9
Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. I. Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium.癌症遗传易感性个体的后续护理建议。I. 遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌。癌症遗传学研究联盟。
JAMA. 1997 Mar 19;277(11):915-9.
10
Hyperplastic polyps in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌中的增生性息肉
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Oct;98(10):2306-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07629.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Colorectal cancer genetic referral: Are we doing enough?结直肠癌基因转诊:我们做得够吗?
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024 Feb 8;37(2):250-254. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2303529. eCollection 2024.
2
Colonoscopy surveillance in Lynch syndrome is burdensome and frequently delayed.林奇综合征的结肠镜监测既繁琐又常被延误。
Fam Cancer. 2023 Oct;22(4):403-411. doi: 10.1007/s10689-023-00333-4. Epub 2023 May 12.
3
Understanding Cancer Worry Among Patients in a Community Clinic-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Intervention Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Colon cancer screening practices after genetic counseling and testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌基因咨询与检测后的结肠癌筛查实践
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 1;22(1):39-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.128.
2
Personal theories of inheritance, coping strategies, risk perception and engagement in hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer families offered genetic testing.在遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌家族中,个人的遗传理论、应对策略、风险认知以及参与情况促使了基因检测的开展。
Clin Genet. 2003 Sep;64(3):179-89. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.00133.x.
3
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
在一项基于社区诊所的结直肠癌筛查干预研究中了解患者的癌症担忧情况。
Nurs Res. 2018 Jul/Aug;67(4):275-285. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000275.
4
Colorectal Cancer in the Young.青年结直肠癌
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2018 Mar 28;20(4):15. doi: 10.1007/s11894-018-0618-9.
5
The Impact of Receiving Predictive Genetic Information about Lynch Syndrome on Individual Colonoscopy and Smoking Behaviors.接受林奇综合征预测性基因信息对个体结肠镜检查和吸烟行为的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Nov;25(11):1524-1533. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0346. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
6
Universal Versus Targeted Screening for Lynch Syndrome: Comparing Ascertainment and Costs Based on Clinical Experience.林奇综合征的通用筛查与靶向筛查:基于临床经验比较确诊率和成本
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Oct;61(10):2887-2895. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4218-y. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
7
Knowledge and Uptake of Genetic Counseling and Colonoscopic Screening Among Individuals at Increased Risk for Lynch Syndrome and their Endoscopists from the Family Health Promotion Project.家庭健康促进项目中林奇综合征风险增加个体及其内镜医师对遗传咨询和结肠镜筛查的认知与接受情况
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;111(2):285-93. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.397. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
8
Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome: family communication and motivation.林奇综合征的基因检测:家庭沟通与动机
Fam Cancer. 2016 Jan;15(1):63-73. doi: 10.1007/s10689-015-9842-8.
9
Screening adherence and cancer risk perceptions in colorectal cancer survivors with Lynch-like syndrome.林奇样综合征结直肠癌幸存者的筛查依从性和癌症风险认知
Clin Genet. 2016 Mar;89(3):392-8. doi: 10.1111/cge.12653. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
10
Practical opportunities to improve early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) in members of high-risk families.改善高危家庭成员结直肠癌(CRC)早期检测和预防的实际机会。
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Mar;60(3):748-61. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3567-2. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
4
No support for endoscopic surveillance for gastric cancer in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.不支持对遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌患者进行胃癌的内镜监测。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002 May;37(5):574-7. doi: 10.1080/00365520252903134.
5
The outcome of endometrial carcinoma surveillance by ultrasound scan in women at risk of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma and familial colorectal carcinoma.超声扫描监测遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌和家族性结直肠癌高危女性子宫内膜癌的结果。
Cancer. 2002 Mar 15;94(6):1708-12. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10380.
6
Comprehension of cancer risk one and 12 months after predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌预测性基因检测后1个月和12个月时对癌症风险的理解。
J Med Genet. 2001 Nov;38(11):787-92. doi: 10.1136/jmg.38.11.787.
7
MSH2 mutation carriers are at higher risk of cancer than MLH1 mutation carriers: a study of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families.与错配修复基因1(MLH1)突变携带者相比,错配修复基因2(MSH2)突变携带者患癌风险更高:一项遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌家族研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Oct 15;19(20):4074-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.20.4074.
8
Atypical HNPCC owing to MSH6 germline mutations: analysis of a large Dutch pedigree.由于MSH6种系突变导致的非典型遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌:对一个大型荷兰家系的分析。
J Med Genet. 2001 May;38(5):318-22. doi: 10.1136/jmg.38.5.318.
9
Colon cancer screening.结肠癌筛查
Gastroenterology. 2000 Sep;119(3):837-53. doi: 10.1053/gast.2000.16508.
10
Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌家族中结直肠癌筛查的15年对照试验。
Gastroenterology. 2000 May;118(5):829-34. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(00)70168-5.