Magzamen Sheryl, Mortimer Kathleen M, Davis Adam, Tager Ira B
Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7360, USA.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2005 Dec;16(8):669-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2005.00304.x.
This study addressed the comparability of data obtained from a student-based and parent-based asthma and respiratory health survey. Our goal was to ascertain whether there were meaningful and systematic differences in asthma classification based on symptom and diagnosis reports obtained separately from students and their parents. A brief, written survey, based on the International Study of Asthma and Allergy in Children questionnaire, was administered to 6th through 10th grade students in two schools in Oakland, CA, USA. Students who reported asthma-like indicators for the previous 12-month period were defined as positive and a more extensive questionnaire was mailed home to those parents. A more refined classification of asthma based on parent report of indicators was compared with student report. Forty-four percent of 1298 students were classified as positive for current asthma-like symptoms and 50% of parent surveys were returned. For the positive students with parent surveys, 59% were classified as 'probable' for asthma based on the parent survey. Overall, the agreement between parent and students' classification was 70%, and 83% for students with a parent report of physician diagnosis of asthma. Students who were discordant with parents for physician diagnosis of asthma were more likely to be male, and more likely to have a parent report of unscheduled Emergency Department visit for wheezing or trouble breathing. Findings indicated that with the exception of medication, students reported asthma indicators more frequently that parents, independent of classification. Student report of physician diagnosis with a 12-month report of an asthma symptom was determined to be a good indicator of probable current asthma. Inclusion of or reliance on a parental questionnaire is not likely to improve the reliability of a school-based asthma surveillance program in our population.
本研究探讨了基于学生和家长的哮喘与呼吸健康调查所获数据的可比性。我们的目标是确定,根据分别从学生及其家长处获得的症状和诊断报告,哮喘分类是否存在有意义的系统性差异。在美国加利福尼亚州奥克兰市的两所学校,对6至10年级的学生进行了一项基于儿童哮喘和过敏国际研究问卷的简短书面调查。报告在过去12个月期间有哮喘样指标的学生被定义为阳性,并向这些学生的家长邮寄了一份更详细的问卷。将基于家长报告的指标对哮喘进行的更精细分类与学生报告进行了比较。1298名学生中有44%被归类为当前有哮喘样症状阳性,家长调查问卷的回收率为50%。对于有家长调查问卷的阳性学生,根据家长调查问卷,59%被归类为哮喘“可能病例”。总体而言,家长和学生分类之间的一致性为70%,对于有家长报告医生诊断为哮喘的学生,一致性为83%。在医生诊断哮喘方面与家长意见不一致的学生更可能是男性,且更可能有家长报告因喘息或呼吸困难而进行的非计划急诊就诊。研究结果表明,除了用药情况外,学生报告哮喘指标的频率高于家长,与分类无关。学生报告医生诊断并伴有12个月哮喘症状报告被确定为当前可能患有哮喘的良好指标。纳入或依赖家长问卷不太可能提高我们人群中基于学校的哮喘监测项目的可靠性。