Fetterman J Gregor
Department of Psychology, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), 402 N. Blackford St., Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Behav Processes. 2006 Feb 28;71(2-3):330-5. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.11.001. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
Pigeons received trials beginning with a sequence of two colors (blue-->yellow) on the center key of a three-key array. The colors lasted different lengths of time. At the end of the sequence pigeons chose between two keys based on a criterial ratio of the temporal sequence. One choice was reinforced if the time ratio was less than the criterion and the alternate choice was reinforced if the time ratio was greater than the criterion. The criterial ratios (first to second duration) were 1:1, 1.5:1, and 3:1. The same set of intervals was used for the different criterion ratios, producing a balanced distribution of time ratios for the 1.5:1 condition, and unbalanced distributions for the 1:1 and 3:1 conditions. That is, for the 1.5:1 condition half of the duration pairs were less than the criterion and half were greater. However, for the 1:1 and 3:1 conditions, more duration pairs were less than (3:1) or greater than (1:1) the criterion. Accuracy was similar across criterion ratios, but response bias was influenced by the asymmetries of time ratios in the 1:1 and 3:1 conditions. When these asymmetries were controlled, the response biases were reduced or eliminated. These results indicate that pigeons are flexible in establishing a criterion for discriminating duration ratios, unlike humans, who are less flexible and are bound to categorical distinctions in the discrimination of duration ratios.
鸽子在一个三键阵列的中央键上接受试验,试验开始时呈现两种颜色的序列(蓝色→黄色)。两种颜色持续的时间长度不同。在序列结束时,鸽子根据时间序列的临界比率在两个键之间进行选择。如果时间比率小于临界值,则一种选择得到强化;如果时间比率大于临界值,则另一种选择得到强化。临界比率(第一种颜色持续时间与第二种颜色持续时间之比)分别为1:1、1.5:1和3:1。对于不同的临界比率,使用相同的一组时间间隔,在1.5:1条件下产生时间比率的平衡分布,在1:1和3:1条件下产生不平衡分布。也就是说,在1.5:1条件下,一半的持续时间对小于临界值,一半大于临界值。然而,在1:1和3:1条件下,更多的持续时间对小于(3:1)或大于(1:1)临界值。不同临界比率下的准确率相似,但反应偏差受到1:1和3:1条件下时间比率不对称性的影响。当这些不对称性得到控制时,反应偏差会减少或消除。这些结果表明,与人类不同,鸽子在建立区分持续时间比率的标准时具有灵活性,人类在区分持续时间比率时灵活性较差,且受限于类别区分。