Suppr超能文献

区分土壤中气态氮产生的硝化和反硝化作用。

Distinguishing between Nitrification and Denitrification as Sources of Gaseous Nitrogen Production in Soil.

机构信息

Department of Forestry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8002, and U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southeastern Experiment Station, Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, Otto, North Carolina 28763.

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Dec;52(6):1280-6. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.6.1280-1286.1986.

Abstract

The source of N(2)O produced in soil is often uncertain because denitrification and nitrification can occur simultaneously in the same soil aggregate. A technique which exploits the differential sensitivity of these processes to C(2)H(2) inhibition is proposed for distinguishing among gaseous N losses from soils. Denitrification N(2)O was estimated from 24-h laboratory incubations in which nitrification was inhibited by 10-Pa C(2)H(2). Nitrification N(2)O was estimated from the difference between N(2)O production under no C(2)H(2) and that determined for denitrification. Denitrification N(2) was estimated from the difference between N(2)O production under 10-kPa C(2)H(2) and that under 10 Pa. Laboratory estimates of N(2)O production were significantly correlated with in situ N(2)O diffusion measurements made during a 10-month period in two forested watersheds. Nitrous oxide production from nitrification was most important on well-drained sites of a disturbed watershed where ambient NO(3) was high. In contrast, denitrification N(2)O was most important on poorly drained sites near the stream of the same watershed. Distinction between N(2)O production from nitrification and denitrification was corroborated by correlations between denitrification N(2)O and water-filled pore space and between nitrification N(2)O and ambient NO(3). This technique permits qualitative study of environmental parameters that regulate gaseous N losses via denitrification and nitrification.

摘要

土壤中 N(2)O 的来源通常不确定,因为反硝化和硝化作用可能同时发生在同一土壤团聚体中。本研究提出了一种利用这些过程对 C(2)H(2)抑制的敏感性差异来区分土壤气态 N 损失的技术。通过 24 小时实验室培养,在 10 Pa 的 C(2)H(2)抑制硝化作用,估算出反硝化 N(2)O。通过比较无 C(2)H(2 时和反硝化时的 N(2)O 生成量来估算硝化 N(2)O。通过比较 10-kPa C(2)H(2 和 10 Pa 下的 N(2)O 生成量来估算反硝化 N(2)。实验室估计的 N(2)O 生成量与在两个森林流域进行的 10 个月期间进行的原位 N(2)O 扩散测量显著相关。在排水良好的干扰流域,环境 NO(3)含量较高的地区,硝化作用产生的 N(2)O 最重要。相比之下,同一流域溪流附近排水不良的地区,反硝化 N(2)O 最重要。反硝化 N(2)O 与水填充孔隙空间之间以及硝化 N(2)O 与环境 NO(3)之间的相关性证实了硝化和反硝化产生的 N(2)O 之间的区别。该技术可定性研究调节反硝化和硝化作用产生气态 N 损失的环境参数。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Carbon Footprint Management by Agricultural Practices.农业实践中的碳足迹管理
Biology (Basel). 2022 Oct 2;11(10):1453. doi: 10.3390/biology11101453.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验