Marine Science Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, P.O. Box 1267, Port Aransas, Texas 78373-1267.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Nov;58(11):3721-9. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.11.3721-3729.1992.
Loss rates and loss processes for viruses in coastal seawater from the Gulf of Mexico were estimated with three different marine bacteriophages. Decay rates in the absence of sunlight ranged from 0.009 to 0.028 h, with different viruses decaying at different rates. In part, decay was attributed to adsorption by heat-labile particles, since viruses did not decay or decayed very slowly in seawater filtered through a 0.2-mum-pore-size filter (0.2-mum-filtered seawater) and in autoclaved or ultracentrifuged seawater but continued to decay in cyanide-treated seawater. Cyanide did cause decay rates to decrease, however, indicating that biological processes were also involved. The observations that decay rates were often greatly reduced in 0.8- or 1.0-mum-filtered seawater, whereas bacterial numbers were not, suggested that most bacteria were not responsible for the decay. Decay rates were also reduced in 3-mum-filtered or cycloheximide-treated seawater but not in 8-mum-filtered seawater, implying that flagellates consumed viruses. Viruses added to flagellate cultures decayed at 0.15 h, corresponding to 3.3 viruses ingested flagellate h. Infectivity was very sensitive to solar radiation and, in full sunlight, decay rates were 0.4 to 0.8 h. Even when UV-B radiation was blocked, rates were as high as 0.17 h. Calculations suggest that in clear oceanic waters exposed to full sunlight, most of the virus decay, averaged over a depth of 200 m, would be attributable to solar radiation. When decay rates were averaged over 24 h for a 10-m coastal water column, loss rates of infectivity attributable to sunlight were similar to those resulting from all other processes combined. Consequently, there should be a strong diel signal in the concentration of infectious viruses. In addition, since sunlight destroys infectivity more quickly than virus particles, a large proportion of the viruses in seawater is probably not infective.
从墨西哥湾的沿海水域用三种不同的海洋噬菌体估计了病毒的损失率和损失过程。在没有阳光的情况下,衰减率在 0.009 到 0.028 小时之间,不同的病毒以不同的速度衰减。部分衰减归因于热不稳定颗粒的吸附,因为病毒在通过 0.2 微米孔径大小的过滤器(0.2 微米过滤海水)过滤的海水中不衰减或衰减非常缓慢,在经过高压灭菌或超速离心处理的海水中也不衰减,但在氰化物处理的海水中继续衰减。然而,氰化物确实导致衰减率降低,表明生物过程也参与其中。观察到的情况是,在 0.8 或 1.0 微米过滤的海水中,衰减率经常大大降低,而细菌数量没有降低,这表明大多数细菌不是衰减的原因。在 3 微米过滤或放线菌酮处理的海水中,衰减率也降低,但在 8 微米过滤的海水中没有降低,这意味着鞭毛藻消耗病毒。添加到鞭毛藻培养物中的病毒在 0.15 小时内衰减,相当于 3.3 个病毒被鞭毛藻摄入 h。感染力对太阳辐射非常敏感,在全日照下,衰减率为 0.4 到 0.8 小时。即使阻挡了 UV-B 辐射,速率仍高达 0.17 小时。计算表明,在清澈的海洋水中,暴露在全日照下,病毒的大部分衰减,平均在 200 米的深度,将归因于太阳辐射。当在 10 米沿海水柱上 24 小时平均衰减率时,归因于阳光的感染性丧失率与所有其他过程的总和相当。因此,在传染性病毒的浓度中应该有一个强烈的昼夜信号。此外,由于阳光比病毒颗粒更快地破坏感染力,海水中的大部分病毒可能没有感染力。