Leventhal Tama, Fauth Rebecca C, Brooks-Gunn Jeanne
Institute of Policy Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Dev Psychol. 2005 Nov;41(6):933-52. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.933.
Data from the Moving to Opportunity Program, a randomized mobility experiment in which a subset of low-income minority families living in public housing in high-poverty neighborhoods were given vouchers to move to low-poverty neighborhoods, were used to evaluate 1 policy approach for improving children's educational outcomes. Four hundred twenty-five New York City children were seen 2 1/2 and 5 years following relocation (mean age=14.64 years, SD=3.21 years). Analyses examining program effects on 5-year educational outcomes, accounting for 2 1/2-year outcomes, revealed that program effects on adolescent boys' achievement found at 2 1/2 years were not sustained at 5 years. Rather, male and female youths 14-20 years of age in low-poverty neighborhoods reported lower school grades and engagement relative to youths in high-poverty neighborhoods. From a policy standpoint, the complexity of enhancing low-income minority children's educational outcomes is underscored by the multiple dynamics involved--family, neighborhood, housing, and school.
“搬到机会”项目的数据被用于评估一种改善儿童教育成果的政策方法。该项目是一项随机流动实验,居住在高贫困社区公共住房中的一部分低收入少数族裔家庭获得了搬到低贫困社区的代金券。在搬迁后的2.5年和5年对425名纽约市儿童进行了观察(平均年龄=14.64岁,标准差=3.21岁)。对项目对5年教育成果的影响进行分析,并考虑到2.5年的成果,结果显示,在2.5岁时发现的项目对青少年男孩成绩的影响在5岁时并未持续。相反,与高贫困社区的青少年相比,低贫困社区14至20岁的青年男女报告的学校成绩和参与度较低。从政策角度来看,涉及家庭、社区、住房和学校的多种动态因素凸显了提高低收入少数族裔儿童教育成果的复杂性。