Partridge Ty
Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Dev Psychol. 2005 Nov;41(6):985-8; discussion 993-7. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.985.
M. McGue, I. Elkins, B. Walden, and W. G. Iacono presented the findings from a twin study examining the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to the developmental trajectories of parent-adolescent relationships. From a behavioral genetics perspective, this study is well conceptualized, is well implemented, and raises some interesting developmental questions. Yet, the classic twin methodology and heritability estimates obfuscate the dynamic gene-ecology transactions that underlie these social developmental trajectories. There is a growing divide between the findings of quantitative behavioral genetics, with its foundational estimate of a statistical genetic influence, and developmental molecular genetics. This comment provides a brief overview of this divide and its implications for the findings of McGue et al. as well as quantitative behavioral genetics more broadly.
M. 麦格、I. 埃尔金斯、B. 瓦尔登和W. G. 亚科诺展示了一项双胞胎研究的结果,该研究考察了遗传和环境因素对亲子关系发展轨迹的相对贡献。从行为遗传学的角度来看,这项研究概念清晰、实施得当,并提出了一些有趣的发展问题。然而,经典的双胞胎研究方法和遗传率估计掩盖了这些社会发展轨迹背后的动态基因 - 生态相互作用。在定量行为遗传学的研究结果(其基础是对统计遗传影响的估计)与发展分子遗传学之间的分歧日益增大。本评论简要概述了这一分歧及其对麦格等人的研究结果以及更广泛的定量行为遗传学的影响。