Cimpian Andrei, Markman Ellen M
Department of PsychologyStanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, USA.
Dev Psychol. 2005 Nov;41(6):1003-19. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.1003.
There is debate about whether preschool-age children interpret words as referring to kinds or to classes defined by shape similarity. The authors argue that the shape bias reported in previous studies is a task-induced artifact rather than a genuine word-learning strategy. In particular, children were forced to extend an object's novel label to one of several stand-alone, simple-shaped items, including a same-shape option from a different category and a different-shape option from the same superordinate category. Across 6 experiments, the authors found that the shape bias was eliminated (a) when the objects were more complex, (b) when they were presented in context, or (c) when children were no longer forced to choose. Moreover, children preferred the different-shape category alternatives when these were part of the same basic-level category as the target. The present experiments suggest that children seek out objects of the same kind when presented with a novel label, even if they are sometimes unable to identify the relevant kinds on their own.
对于学龄前儿童是将词语理解为指代种类还是由形状相似性定义的类别,存在争议。作者认为,先前研究中报道的形状偏好是任务诱导的假象,而非真正的词汇学习策略。具体而言,儿童被迫将一个物体的新标签扩展到几个独立的、形状简单的物品之一,包括来自不同类别的相同形状选项和来自同一上级类别的不同形状选项。在6个实验中,作者发现,当物体更复杂时、当它们在情境中呈现时或当儿童不再被迫选择时,形状偏好就会消除。此外,当不同形状的类别选项与目标属于同一基本级别类别时,儿童更喜欢这些选项。目前的实验表明,当面对一个新标签时,儿童会寻找同类物体,即使他们有时无法自行识别相关种类。