Grigor'ev Iu G, Shafirkin A V, Vasin A L
Aviakosm Ekolog Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;39(4):3-18.
There is still much controversy in scientific approaches to setting limits of exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation in Russia, Europe and USA. The stumbling stone is recognition or denial of potential risk of biological effects from nonthermal electromagnetic radiation (to 1 mW/cm2). The authors review results of experimental investigations performed in Russia over the years since 1960s to study the direct and delayed effects of ultra-high and microwave frequencies of low non-thermal intensity EMR, and delayed negative effects in employees based on the data of several follow-up epidemiological studies. This evidence was used as a baseline for establishing the Russian limits for chronic exposure to, thresholds of harmful effects and the maximal admissible values of EMR within the above frequencies.
在俄罗斯、欧洲和美国,关于设定射频电磁辐射暴露限值的科学方法仍存在诸多争议。绊脚石在于对非热电磁辐射(至1毫瓦/平方厘米)生物效应潜在风险的认可或否认。作者回顾了自20世纪60年代以来俄罗斯进行的实验研究结果,以研究低非热强度电磁辐射的超高频率和微波频率的直接和延迟效应,并根据多项后续流行病学研究的数据,分析员工的延迟负面影响。这些证据被用作确定俄罗斯上述频率范围内慢性暴露限值、有害效应阈值和电磁辐射最大允许值的基线。
Bioelectromagnetics. 1996
Lens Eye Toxic Res. 1989
Biomed Pharmacother. 2008-2
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2001-11
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1983-6
Ugeskr Laeger. 1994-3-14