Cogdill Robert P, Anderson Carl A, Delgado-Lopez Miriam, Molseed David, Chisholm Robert, Bolton Raymond, Herkert Thorsten, Afnán Ali M, Drennen James K
Duquesne University Center for Pharmaceutical Technology, Pittsburgh, PA 16066, USA.
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2005 Oct 6;6(2):E262-72. doi: 10.1208/pt060237.
This article is the first of a series of articles detailing the development of near-infrared (NIR) methods for solid-dosage form analysis. Experiments were conducted at the Duquesne University Center for Pharmaceutical Technology to qualify the capabilities of instrumentation and sample handling systems, evaluate the potential effect of one source of a process signature on calibration development, and compare the utility of reflection and transmission data collection methods. A database of 572 production-scale sample spectra was used to evaluate the interbatch spectral variability of samples produced under routine manufacturing conditions. A second database of 540 spectra from samples produced under various compression conditions was analyzed to determine the feasibility of pooling spectral data acquired from samples produced at diverse scales. Instrument qualification tests were performed, and appropriate limits for instrument performance were established. To evaluate the repeatability of the sample positioning system, multiple measurements of a single tablet were collected. With the application of appropriate spectral preprocessing techniques, sample repositioning error was found to be insignificant with respect to NIR analyses of product quality attributes. Sample shielding was demonstrated to be unnecessary for transmission analyses. A process signature was identified in the reflection data. Additional tests demonstrated that the process signature was largely orthogonal to spectral variation because of hardness. Principal component analysis of the compression sample set data demonstrated the potential for quantitative model development. For the data sets studied, reflection analysis was demonstrated to be more robust than transmission analysis.
本文是一系列详细介绍用于固体制剂分析的近红外(NIR)方法发展的文章中的第一篇。在杜肯大学制药技术中心进行了实验,以鉴定仪器和样品处理系统的性能,评估过程特征的一个来源在校准开发中的潜在影响,并比较反射和透射数据采集方法的效用。使用一个包含572个生产规模样品光谱的数据库来评估常规生产条件下生产的样品的批次间光谱变异性。分析了第二个包含540个来自不同压缩条件下生产的样品光谱的数据库,以确定合并从不同规模生产的样品获取的光谱数据的可行性。进行了仪器鉴定测试,并建立了仪器性能的适当限度。为了评估样品定位系统的重复性,对单个片剂进行了多次测量。通过应用适当的光谱预处理技术,发现相对于产品质量属性的近红外分析,样品重新定位误差不显著。结果表明,透射分析无需样品屏蔽。在反射数据中识别出一个过程特征。进一步的测试表明,该过程特征在很大程度上与因硬度导致的光谱变化正交。对压缩样品集数据进行主成分分析证明了定量模型开发的潜力。对于所研究的数据集,结果表明反射分析比透射分析更稳健。