Kollef Marin H, Shorr Andrew, Tabak Ying P, Gupta Vikas, Liu Larry Z, Johannes R S
Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Chest. 2005 Dec;128(6):3854-62. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.6.3854.
Traditionally, pneumonia developing in patients outside the hospital is categorized as community acquired, even if these patients have been receiving health care in an outpatient facility. Accumulating evidence suggests that health-care-associated infections are distinct from those that are truly community acquired.
To characterize the microbiology and outcomes among patients with culture-positive community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), health-care-associated pneumonia (HCAP), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).
A retrospective cohort study based on a large US inpatient database.
A total of 4,543 patients with culture-positive pneumonia admitted into 59 US hospitals between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2003, and recorded in a large, multi-institutional database of US acute-care hospitals (Cardinal Health-Atlas Research Database; Cardinal Health Clinical Knowledge Services; Marlborough, MA).
Culture data (respiratory and blood), in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), and billed hospital charges.
Approximately one half of hospitalized patients with pneumonia had CAP, and > 20% had HCAP. Staphylococcus aureus was a major pathogen in all pneumonia types, with its occurrence markedly higher in the non-CAP groups than in the CAP group. Mortality rates associated with HCAP (19.8%) and HAP (18.8%) were comparable (p > 0.05), and both were significantly higher than that for CAP (10%, all p < 0.0001) and lower than that for VAP (29.3%, all p < 0.0001). Mean LOS varied significantly with pneumonia category (in order of ascending values: CAP, HCAP, HAP, and VAP; all p < 0.0001). Similarly, mean hospital charge varied significantly with pneumonia category (in order of ascending value: CAP, HCAP, HAP, and VAP; all p < 0.0001).
The present analysis justified HCAP as a new category of pneumonia. S aureus was a major pathogen of all pneumonias with higher rates in non-CAP pneumonias. Compared with CAP, non-CAP was associated with more severe disease, higher mortality rate, greater LOS, and increased cost.
传统上,在医院外发病的肺炎患者被归类为社区获得性肺炎,即便这些患者一直在门诊接受医疗护理。越来越多的证据表明,与医疗保健相关的感染与真正社区获得性感染有所不同。
描述培养结果为阳性的社区获得性肺炎(CAP)、医疗保健相关性肺炎(HCAP)、医院获得性肺炎(HAP)和呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)患者的微生物学特征及转归情况。
基于美国一个大型住院患者数据库开展的一项回顾性队列研究。
2002年1月1日至2003年12月31日期间,共有4543例培养结果为阳性的肺炎患者入住美国59家医院,并记录在美国一家大型多机构急性护理医院数据库(红衣主教健康 - 阿特拉斯研究数据库;红衣主教健康临床知识服务;马萨诸塞州马尔伯勒)中。
培养数据(呼吸道和血液)、住院死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和住院费用。
住院的肺炎患者中约一半患有CAP,超过20%患有HCAP。金黄色葡萄球菌是所有类型肺炎的主要病原体,在非CAP组中的发生率明显高于CAP组。HCAP(19.8%)和HAP(18.8%)的死亡率相当(p>0.05),且均显著高于CAP的死亡率(10%,所有p<0.0001),低于VAP的死亡率(29.3%,所有p<0.0001)。平均住院时间因肺炎类型不同而有显著差异(按数值升序排列:CAP、HCAP、HAP和VAP;所有p<0.0001)。同样,平均住院费用也因肺炎类型不同而有显著差异(按数值升序排列:CAP、HCAP、HAP和VAP;所有p<0.0001)。
本分析证明HCAP可作为一种新的肺炎类型。金黄色葡萄球菌是所有肺炎的主要病原体,在非CAP肺炎中发生率更高。与CAP相比,非CAP与更严重的疾病、更高的死亡率、更长的住院时间和更高的费用相关。