• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[火力楠、木荷和黧蒴栲林分的土壤性质及持水能力]

[Soil properties and water holding capacites of Michelia macclurei, Schima superba and Castanopis fissa stands].

作者信息

Xue Li, Li Yan, Qu Ming, Yan Shu, Wang Xing

机构信息

Huitong Experimental Station of Forest Ecology, Chinese Acadeny of Sciences, Huitong 418307, China.

出版信息

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2005 Sep;16(9):1623-7.

PMID:16355772
Abstract

The study showed that the soil density, total porosity, natural water capacity and capillary moisture capacity were 1.19 g x cm(-3), 56.73%, 15.7% and 43.2% in Michelia nacclurei stand, 1.26 g x cm(-3), 54.18%, 13.0% and 37.8% in Schima superb stand, and 1.06 g x cm(-3), 60.74%, 19.4%, and 45.8% in Castanopsis fissa stand, respectively. Soil water holding capacity and aeration were good in Castanopsis fissa stand but bad in Schima superba stand, whereas Michelia macclurei stand had a medium water holding capacity and a bad aeration. The water holding capacity of litter per tree was in order of Michelia nuacclurei (20 kg) > Castanopsis fissa (15 kg) > Schima superba (8 kg), whereas that of litter in stand was Castanopsis fissa (17 t x hm(-2)) > Michelia macclurei (16 t x hm(-2)) > Schima superba (13 t x hm(-2)). The nutrient storage of litter per tree was 112.71, 31.20 and 87.30 g in Michelia macclurei, Schima superba and Castanopsis fissa stands, respectively, and that of litter in stand was 84.35,51.86 and 98.11 kg x hm(-2), respectively. The soil in the three stands was strong acidic, and the content of soil organic matter, total N, total P, total K, alkalized N, available P and available K was 18.43 g x kg(-1), 0.69 g x kg(-1), 0.17 g x kg(-1), 5.83 g x kg(-1), 45.67 mg x kg(-1), 0.83 mg x kg(-1) and 23.13 mg x kg(-1) in Michelia macclurei stand, 13.40 g x kg(-1), 0.68 g x kg(-1), 0.20 g x kg(-1), 12.32 g x kg(-1), 40.78 mg x kg(-1), 0.85 mg x kg(-1) and 90.63 mg x kg(-1) in Schima superba stand, and 28.50 g x kg(-1), 0.97 g x kg(-1), 0.23 g x kg(-1), 18.77 g x kg(-1), 73.40 mg x kg(-1), 1.45 mg x kg(-1) and 66.50 mg x kg(-1) in Castanopsis fissa stand, respectively. Soil bacteria accounted for > 94% of soil microbes, and their individuals were 41 x 105, 34 x 104 and 5.3 x 104 g(-1) in Michelia macclurei, Schima superba and Castanopsis fissa stands, respectively. The activities of soil urease, catalase and phosphatase in Castanopsis fissa stand were the greatest among the three stands, while soil cellulase activity in Michelia macclurei stand was greater than that in other two stands. In a word, soil fertility of Castanopsis fissa stand was the highest among three test stands.

摘要

研究表明,火力楠林分的土壤密度、总孔隙度、自然持水量和毛管持水量分别为1.19 g·cm⁻³、56.73%、15.7%和43.2%;木荷林分分别为1.26 g·cm⁻³、54.18%、13.0%和37.8%;黧蒴栲林分分别为1.06 g·cm⁻³、60.74%、19.4%和45.8%。黧蒴栲林分的土壤持水能力和通气性良好,木荷林分的较差,而火力楠林分的持水能力中等,通气性较差。单株凋落物持水量顺序为火力楠(20 kg)>黧蒴栲(15 kg)>木荷(8 kg),林分凋落物持水量顺序为黧蒴栲(17 t·hm⁻²)>火力楠(16 t·hm⁻²)>木荷(13 t·hm⁻²)。单株凋落物养分储量在火力楠、木荷和黧蒴栲林分中分别为112.71、31.20和87.30 g,林分凋落物养分储量分别为84.35、51.86和98.11 kg·hm⁻²。3种林分土壤均为强酸性,火力楠林分土壤有机质、全氮、全磷、全钾、碱化氮、有效磷和速效钾含量分别为18.43 g·kg⁻¹、0.69 g·kg⁻¹、0.17 g·kg⁻¹、5.83 g·kg⁻¹、45.67 mg·kg⁻¹、0.83 mg·kg⁻¹和23.13 mg·kg⁻¹;木荷林分分别为13.40 g·kg⁻¹、0.68 g·kg⁻¹、0.20 g·kg⁻¹、12.32 g·kg⁻¹、40.78 mg·kg⁻¹、0.85 mg·kg⁻¹和90.63 mg·kg⁻¹;黧蒴栲林分分别为28.50 g·kg⁻¹、0.97 g·kg⁻¹、0.23 g·kg⁻¹、18.77 g·kg⁻¹、73.40 mg·kg⁻¹、1.45 mg·kg⁻¹和66.50 mg·kg⁻¹。土壤细菌占土壤微生物的比例>94%,其个体数量在火力楠、木荷和黧蒴栲林分中分别为41×10⁵、34×10⁴和5.3×10⁴ g⁻¹。黧蒴栲林分土壤脲酶、过氧化氢酶和磷酸酶活性在3种林分中最强,而火力楠林分土壤纤维素酶活性大于其他两种林分。总之,黧蒴栲林分的土壤肥力在3个试验林分中最高。

相似文献

1
[Soil properties and water holding capacites of Michelia macclurei, Schima superba and Castanopis fissa stands].[火力楠、木荷和黧蒴栲林分的土壤性质及持水能力]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2005 Sep;16(9):1623-7.
2
[Soil nutrient, microorganism and enzyme activity in Pinus elliottii mixed stands].[湿地松混交林土壤养分、微生物及酶活性]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2003 Jan;14(1):157-9.
3
[Soil quality assessment of forest stand in different plantation esosystems].[不同人工林生态系统中林分的土壤质量评估]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2004 Dec;15(12):2199-205.
4
[Nutrient characteristics in leaves of broadleaved seedlings in south China].[中国南方阔叶树苗叶片的养分特征]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2003 Nov;14(11):1820-4.
5
[Effects of litter coverage and watering frequency on seed germination and seedling survival of Castanopsis fissa].凋落物覆盖度和浇水频率对黧蒴锥种子萌发及幼苗存活的影响
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2008 Oct;19(10):2097-102.
6
[Effects of different ground clearance on soil fertility of Chinese fir stands].
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2005 Aug;16(8):1417-21.
7
[Aboveground biomass of natural Castanopsis carlesii-Schima superba community in Xiaokeng of Nanling Mountains, South China].[中国南方南岭小坑天然米槠-木荷群落地上生物量]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2013 Sep;24(9):2399-407.
8
Schima superba outperforms other tree species by changing foliar chemical composition and shortening construction payback time when facilitated by shrubs.受灌丛促进时,浙江润楠通过改变叶片化学组成和缩短建设投资回报期而优于其他树种。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 27;6:19855. doi: 10.1038/srep19855.
9
[Litter decomposition of dominant plant species in successional stages in mid-subtropical zone].[中亚热带演替阶段优势植物物种的凋落物分解]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2009 Mar;20(3):537-42.
10
[Decomposition interaction of mixed litter between Chinese fir and various accompanying plant species].[杉木与不同伴生植物物种混合凋落物的分解相互作用]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2001 Jun;12(3):321-5.