Darendeliler F, Berberoğlu M, Ocal G, Adiyaman P, Bundak R, Günöz H, Baş F, Darcan S, Gökşen D, Arslanoğlu I, Yildiz M, Ercan O, Ercan G, Ozerkan E, Can S, Böber E, Adal E, Sarikaya S, Dallar Y, Siklar Z, Bircan I, Bideci A, Yüksel B, Büyükgebiz A
Department of Pediatrics, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Oct;18(10):949-54. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2005.18.10.949.
To compare the growth response to growth hormone (GH) treatment in patients with idiopathic GH deficiency (IGHD) who were prepubertal with the response of those who were pubertal at the onset of GH therapy on an increased GH dose.
Among the Turkish patients enrolled in the Pfizer International Growth Study (KIGS) database with the diagnosis of IGHD, the growth data over 2 years of GH therapy were analyzed longitudinally of 113 (79 M) prepubertal (Group 1) and 44 (33 M) pubertal (Group 2) patients. Pubertal signs were reported to be present initially or to have appeared within 6 months of GH therapy in Group 2. Mean +/- SD age at onset of therapy was 8.7 +/- 3.5 and 13.5 +/- 1.8 years; height SDS -4.2 +/- 1.4 and -3.2 +/- 1.1 (p < 0.05) in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Mid-parental height (MPH) SDS did not show a significant difference between the two groups (-1.5 +/- 1.1 vs -1.7 +/- 1.1).
Delta height SDS over 2 years of therapy was significantly higher in Group 1 (1.1 +/- 1.0) than in Group 2 (0.7 +/- 0.6) (p <0.05) in spite of a significantly lower dose of GH (14.6 +/- 3.3 in Group 1 vs 17.0 +/- 3.1 IU/m2/week in Group 2, p < 0.05). Ht--MPH SDS showed an increase from -2.4 +/- 1.7 to -1.4 +/- 1.5 in Group 1 and from -1.5 +/- 1.5 to -0.8 +/- 1.3 in Group 2. Overall delta height SDS showed negative correlations with age (r = -0.32), height SDS (r = -0.41) and height--MPH SDS (r = -0.40) at onset of therapy (p < 0.001).
These data show that in IGHD the slight increase (15-20%) in the dose of GH during puberty was not adequate to maintain height velocity at the same magnitude as in prepuberty, and thus was not cost effective.
比较特发性生长激素缺乏症(IGHD)患者在青春期前接受生长激素(GH)治疗时的生长反应,以及那些在开始GH治疗时已进入青春期且增加了GH剂量的患者的生长反应。
在辉瑞国际生长研究(KIGS)数据库中登记的诊断为IGHD的土耳其患者中,对113例(79例男性)青春期前患者(第1组)和44例(33例男性)青春期患者(第2组)进行了纵向分析,这些患者接受了2年的GH治疗。据报告,第2组患者最初出现青春期体征或在GH治疗6个月内出现青春期体征。治疗开始时的平均±标准差年龄分别为8.7±3.5岁和13.5±1.8岁;第1组和第2组的身高标准差评分分别为-4.2±1.4和-3.2±1.1(p<0.05)。两组间的父母平均身高(MPH)标准差评分无显著差异(-1.5±1.1对-1.7±1.1)。
尽管第1组的GH剂量显著低于第2组(第1组为14.6±3.3,第2组为17.0±3.1IU/m²/周,p<0.05),但第1组在2年治疗期间的身高标准差评分增量(1.1±1.0)显著高于第2组(0.7±0.6)(p<0.05)。第1组的身高-父母平均身高标准差评分从-2.4±1.7增加到-1.4±1.5,第2组从-1.5±1.5增加到-0.8±1.3。总体身高标准差评分增量与治疗开始时的年龄(r=-0.32)、身高标准差评分(r=-0.41)和身高-父母平均身高标准差评分(r=-0.40)呈负相关(p<0.001)。
这些数据表明,在IGHD患者中,青春期GH剂量轻微增加(15-20%)不足以维持与青春期前相同幅度的身高增长速度因此不具有成本效益。