Suppr超能文献

根据国际妇产科联盟新分期标准探讨子宫内膜癌患者剖腹探查术的价值。

The value of exploratory laparotomy in patients with endometrial carcinoma according to the new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging.

作者信息

Vardi J R, Tadros G H, Anselmo M T, Rafla S D

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maimonides Medical Center, State University of New York, Brooklyn.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Aug;80(2):204-8.

PMID:1635733
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a retrospective review of 169 consecutive patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma to evaluate the advantage of exploratory laparotomy according to the new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification as compared with clinical staging.

METHODS

All 169 patients were admitted to the Department of Gynecologic Oncology from August 1980 through June 1988 and underwent exploratory laparotomy, which included total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and peritoneal washings. We performed complete lymph node dissection of the pelvic and the para-aortic areas on 87 patients with clinical stages I and II. Eighteen more patients were upgraded to stage III or IV during exploratory laparotomy with lymph node biopsy. Forty-nine patients did not have lymph node dissection because of age and medical contraindications. In 15 patients with clinical stage III or IV, lymph node dissection was performed as part of debulking surgery. Clinical staging showed 135 patients (80%) with stage I, 19 (11%) with stage II, three (2%) with stage III, and 12 (7%) with stage IV carcinoma.

RESULTS

Surgical restaging according to the new FIGO classification resulted in 117 patients (69%) with stage I, seven (4%) with stage II, 23 (14%) with stage III, and 22 (13%) with stage IV carcinoma. Thirty patients (19%) of 154 with clinical stage I or II had extrauterine spread. Thirty-three of 169 patients (19.5%) had their clinical staging upgraded and six (3.5%) were downgraded. The 5-year actuarial survival rates for clinical stages I, II, and IV were 83, 64, and 8%, respectively. The actuarial survival rates for surgical stages I, II, III, and IV were 89, 100, 58, and 24%, respectively. Cases surgically staged as I with high-risk variables (eg, poor differentiation, unfavorable histologic types, and deep myometrial invasion) or stage II received 5000 cGy to the whole pelvis using a box technique. Patients with surgical stage III or IV received adjuvant intravenous chemotherapy (eg, doxorubicin, hydrochloride, Cytoxan, and cisplatin) consecutively for ten to 12 courses. Megestrol acetate was added for 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical staging after exploratory laparotomy defined the true extent of disease and identified 20% of the cases that may escape effective treatment.

摘要

目的

我们对169例连续诊断为子宫内膜癌的患者进行了回顾性研究,以评估根据国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)新分类法进行的剖腹探查术相对于临床分期的优势。

方法

1980年8月至1988年6月期间,所有169例患者均入住妇科肿瘤科并接受了剖腹探查术,包括全腹子宫切除术、双侧输卵管卵巢切除术和腹腔冲洗。我们对87例临床分期为I期和II期的患者进行了盆腔和腹主动脉旁区域的完整淋巴结清扫。另外18例患者在剖腹探查术及淋巴结活检过程中被升级为III期或IV期。49例患者因年龄和医学禁忌证未进行淋巴结清扫。15例临床分期为III期或IV期的患者进行了淋巴结清扫,作为肿瘤细胞减灭术的一部分。临床分期显示,135例(80%)为I期癌,19例(11%)为II期癌,3例(2%)为III期癌,12例(7%)为IV期癌。

结果

根据FIGO新分类法进行的手术分期显示,117例(69%)为I期癌,7例(4%)为II期癌,23例(14%)为III期癌,22例(13%)为IV期癌。154例临床分期为I期或II期的患者中有30例(19%)存在子宫外扩散。169例患者中有33例(19.5%)临床分期被升级,6例(3.5%)被降级。临床分期I期、II期和IV期的5年精算生存率分别为83%、64%和8%。手术分期I期、II期、III期和IV期的精算生存率分别为89%、100%、58%和24%。手术分期为I期且具有高危因素(如分化差、组织学类型不良和肌层浸润深)或II期的病例,采用盒式技术对全盆腔给予5000 cGy照射。手术分期为III期或IV期的患者连续接受10至12个疗程的辅助静脉化疗(如阿霉素、环磷酰胺和顺铂)。加用醋酸甲地孕酮2年。

结论

剖腹探查术后的手术分期明确了疾病的真实范围,并识别出20%可能无法得到有效治疗的病例。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验