Richards B C, Thomasson G
Copic Insurance Company, Denver, Colorado.
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Aug;80(2):313-6.
An analysis of 353 closed claims involving obstetrician-gynecologists revealed that the 40 highest-paid claims (11.3%) accounted for 88.7% of the total dollars spent. Newborn obstetrics, maternal obstetrics, and delayed-diagnosis claims represented 80%. Five doctors represented in the top 13 claims had another one or two claims among the highest 40. Only one of these physicians is still in good standing with the insurance company. Twelve claims (30%) were judged to be nonmeritorious, resulting in indemnity in five cases. Most of these claims illustrated either deficits with the medical record or system failures. A number of these problems could be prevented by avoiding system failures and by regarding the medical record as a legal document. Lawsuits occasionally resulted in an unfair distribution of dollars to injured parties and led to justifiable restriction of few physicians. It is critical that there be a record of why something was done. If the record is silent, there is no defense. An erroneous decision may be defensible if the reasons leading to it are recorded in the chart.
一项对353起涉及妇产科医生的结案索赔案的分析显示,赔付金额最高的40起索赔案(占11.3%)占总赔付金额的88.7%。新生儿产科、产妇产科和延迟诊断索赔案占80%。在赔付金额最高的13起索赔案中涉及的5名医生,在赔付金额最高的40起索赔案中还有另外一到两起索赔案。这些医生中只有一名仍与保险公司保持良好关系。12起索赔案(占30%)被判定为无价值,其中5起获得了赔偿。这些索赔案大多表明病历存在缺陷或系统故障。通过避免系统故障并将病历视为法律文件,可以预防其中一些问题。诉讼偶尔会导致向受害方不公平地分配资金,并导致对少数医生进行合理限制。记录做事的原因至关重要。如果记录中没有说明,就没有辩护的依据。如果导致错误决定的原因记录在病历中,那么这个错误决定可能是有辩护依据的。