Benson Paul D, Marshall Melanie K, Engelstad Mark E, Kushner George M, Alpert Brian
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Jan;64(1):122-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.09.024.
Current approaches to the treatment of infected mandibular fractures include antibiotics, drainage, immobilization of the segments, and debridement followed by secondary bone grafting of residual defects once the infection is resolved and the wound healed. Over the past 30 years, the time from debridement to grafting has diminished from several months to a few weeks. We present our experience with a treatment model managing clinically infected fractures of the mandible with antibiotics, debridement, rigid internal fixation, and immediate autogenous bone grafting.
In this retrospective study, we present a series of 43 patients who demonstrated clinical/laboratory findings consistent with infection in one or more mandibular fractures (50 infected fractures). These patients underwent a combination of incision and drainage, fracture debridement, rigid internal fixation, and immediate bone grafting of the resulting defect in a single stage. Both transoral and transfacial approaches were used.
Of the 50 fractures, 43 showed both resolution of infection and bony union of fractures with long-term follow-up of 2 months to 4 years. Four fractures developed recurrent infection but proved to have bony union and were successfully treated by hardware removal only. Three other patients were deemed failures with persistent infection, loss of graft, nonunion, and need for retreatment. Each of these patients was afflicted with underlying immunocompromise.
Although careful patient selection is a must, immediate bone grafting of infected mandibular fractures, when used in conjunction with rigid internal fixation and appropriate intraoperative debridement, is an effective treatment modality which allows a single surgical procedure and dramatically shortens the course of treatment.
目前治疗感染性下颌骨骨折的方法包括使用抗生素、引流、固定骨折段以及清创,待感染消退且伤口愈合后,对残留缺损进行二期骨移植。在过去30年里,从清创到植骨的时间已从数月缩短至数周。我们介绍了一种治疗模式的经验,该模式采用抗生素、清创、坚固内固定和即刻自体骨移植来处理临床感染的下颌骨骨折。
在这项回顾性研究中,我们呈现了一系列43例患者,他们表现出与一处或多处下颌骨骨折感染相符的临床/实验室检查结果(共50处感染性骨折)。这些患者在同一阶段接受了切开引流、骨折清创、坚固内固定以及对所形成缺损进行即刻骨移植的联合治疗。经口和经面部入路均有使用。
在这50处骨折中,43处经2个月至4年的长期随访显示感染消退且骨折骨性愈合。4处骨折出现复发性感染,但证实有骨性愈合,仅通过取出内固定物即成功治愈。另外3例患者被视为治疗失败,存在持续感染、植骨丢失、骨不连且需要再次治疗。这些患者均伴有潜在的免疫功能低下。
尽管必须仔细选择患者,但感染性下颌骨骨折即刻骨移植,若与坚固内固定及适当的术中清创联合使用,是一种有效的治疗方式,可实现单次手术操作并显著缩短治疗疗程。