Suppr超能文献

性别、癌症经历与互联网使用:对访谈及在线癌症支持小组的比较关键词分析

Gender, cancer experience and internet use: a comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups.

作者信息

Seale Clive, Ziebland Sue, Charteris-Black Jonathan

机构信息

School of Social Sciences and Law, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH, UK.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2006 May;62(10):2577-90. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.016. Epub 2005 Dec 19.

Abstract

A new method, comparative keyword analysis, is used to compare the language of men and women with cancer in 97 research interviews and two popular internet based support groups for people with cancer. The method is suited to the conjoint qualitative and quantitative analysis of differences between large bodies of text, an alternative to the 'code and retrieval' approach used in much thematic analysis of qualitative materials. Web forums are a rich source of data about illness experience and gender differences. Marked differences in the performance of gender are evident. These differences follow linguistic and other behavioural patterns (such as social network differences) established in other contexts. Men with prostate cancer indicate in research interviews that they are more likely to seek information on the internet; women with breast cancer that they are more likely to seek social and emotional support. Men's concerns cluster around treatment information, medical personnel and procedures. Their experience of disease is more localised on particular areas of the body, while women's experience is more holistic. Women's forum postings orientate much more towards the exchange of emotional support, including concern with the impact of illness on a wide range of other people. Women's use of superlatives as well as words referring to feelings indicate their enactment of greater emotional expressivity. Web forums are platforms for an intensification of men's knowledge gathering activities. Web forums, though actually quite publicly visible, appear to be subjectively experienced by both sexes as relatively private places for the exchange of intimate personal information. The 'privacy' of the breast cancer forum facilitated interactions found in other studies to be characteristic of women's friendship groups.

摘要

一种新方法——比较关键词分析,被用于在97次研究访谈以及两个面向癌症患者的热门网络支持小组中,比较患癌男性和女性的语言。该方法适用于对大量文本之间的差异进行定性与定量相结合的分析,是定性材料主题分析中常用的“编码与检索”方法的替代方法。网络论坛是关于疾病经历和性别差异的丰富数据来源。性别表现上的显著差异很明显。这些差异遵循在其他情境中确立的语言及其他行为模式(如社交网络差异)。前列腺癌男性在研究访谈中表示,他们更有可能在互联网上寻求信息;乳腺癌女性则表示,她们更有可能寻求社会和情感支持。男性关注的问题集中在治疗信息、医务人员和程序上。他们对疾病的体验更多地局限于身体的特定部位,而女性的体验则更具整体性。女性在论坛上的发帖更多地倾向于情感支持的交流,包括对疾病对其他众多人的影响的关注。女性使用最高级以及提及感受的词汇,表明她们表现出更强的情感表达能力。网络论坛是男性强化知识收集活动的平台。网络论坛虽然实际上相当公开可见,但在两性看来,似乎都是相对私密的地方,可以用来交流私密的个人信息。乳腺癌论坛的“私密性”促进了在其他研究中发现的、女性友谊群体所特有的互动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验