• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[How to assess the severity of the multi-system trauma in the emergency-room -- a critical review].

作者信息

Kulla M, Fischer S, Helm M, Lampl L

机构信息

Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Abteilung für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Ulm.

出版信息

Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2005 Dec;40(12):726-36. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870247.

DOI:10.1055/s-2005-870247
PMID:16362873
Abstract

For more than 30 years various scoring systems have been used as a method to asses the injury severity of multi-system trauma. They have been used as a tool for triage, for emergency-room quality management, for educational reasons or, nowadays, in order to evaluate the cost effectiveness of either a complete hospital or a single department. This review provides the knowledge to score multi-system traumatized patients after their first treatment in the emergency-room. It shows advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of various traumascores which includes knowledge about the used parameters, the type of validation, the medical system in their country of origin, and of course their mathematical background. Relevant examples like physiological trauma scores (GCS, RTS, MEES), anatomic, injury pattern based scores (ISS, NISS, ICISS), biological aspects, mixed scoring systems (PTS, TRISS, ASCOT) and future developments ("Rixen-pattern", RISC) are illustrated. These scores are explained in detail and discussed as to their practicability.

摘要

相似文献

1
[How to assess the severity of the multi-system trauma in the emergency-room -- a critical review].
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2005 Dec;40(12):726-36. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870247.
2
A comparison of "life threatening injury" concept in the Turkish Penal Code and trauma scoring systems.土耳其刑法典中“危及生命的伤害”概念与创伤评分系统的比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2007 Jul;13(3):192-8.
3
Validation of international trauma scoring systems in urban trauma centres in India.国际创伤评分系统在印度城市创伤中心的验证
Injury. 2016 Nov;47(11):2459-2464. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
4
[Score systems in emergency medicine].[急诊医学中的评分系统]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1993 Jun;28(4):222-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-998911.
5
[Emergency room management of multiple injured patients. A multislice computed tomography orientated treatment algorithm].[多发伤患者的急诊室管理。一种基于多层螺旋计算机断层扫描的治疗算法]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2005 Dec;40(12):720-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-921036.
6
[Value of clinical scoring systems for evaluation of injury severity and as an instrument for quality management of severely injured patients].[临床评分系统在评估损伤严重程度及作为重伤患者质量管理工具方面的价值]
Zentralbl Chir. 1996;121(11):914-23.
7
[Analysis of quality in a first level trauma center in Milan, Italy].[意大利米兰某一级创伤中心的质量分析]
Ann Ital Chir. 2006 Mar-Apr;77(2):97-106.
8
[Quality assessment of multiple trauma management bu ISS, TRISS or ASCOT?].
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 2000 Apr 8;130(14):499-504.
9
[Is the Mainz Emergency Evaluation Scoring system (MEES) in combination with capnometry (MEESc) useful in prehospital prediction of outcome in trauma with ISS > 14?].[美因茨紧急评估评分系统(MEES)联合二氧化碳监测(MEESc)对创伤严重程度评分(ISS)>14的创伤患者的院前预后预测是否有用?]
Acta Med Croatica. 2007 Apr;61(2):195-200.
10
Management deficiencies and death preventability of road traffic fatalities before and after a new trauma care system in Victoria, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州新创伤护理系统前后道路交通死亡事故的管理缺陷及死亡可预防性
J Trauma. 2007 Aug;63(2):331-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31806dc5c4.

引用本文的文献

1
Polytrauma scoring revisited: prognostic validity and usability in daily clinical practice.再次探讨多发伤评分:在日常临床实践中的预后准确性和实用性。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun;50(3):649-656. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02035-5. Epub 2022 Jul 10.
2
Discrimination and calibration of a prediction model for mortality is decreased in secondary transferred patients: a validation in the TraumaRegister DGU.二次转移患者的死亡率预测模型的判别和校准能力降低:创伤登记处德国创伤学会的验证。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 13;12(4):e056381. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056381.
3
A Selection of Trauma Scores Might Not Correlate with Coagulation Factor Activity following Multiple Injuries: A Retrospective Observational Study from a Level 1 Trauma Center.
多发伤患者凝血因子活性与创伤评分选择无相关性:来自 1 级创伤中心的回顾性观察性研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Dec 30;2020:6726017. doi: 10.1155/2020/6726017. eCollection 2020.
4
[Frequency and management of complex facial fractures-an oral and maxillofacial surgical assessment].[复杂面部骨折的频率及处理——口腔颌面外科评估]
Unfallchirurg. 2019 Sep;122(9):711-718. doi: 10.1007/s00113-019-0618-8.
5
[Resuscitation room management for trauma patients].[创伤患者的复苏室管理]
Anaesthesist. 2019 Jan;68(1):49-66. doi: 10.1007/s00101-018-0523-5.
6
[Civilian blast injuries: an underestimated problem? : Results of a retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU®].[平民爆炸伤:一个被低估的问题?:创伤登记DGU®回顾性分析结果]
Unfallchirurg. 2016 Oct;119(10):843-53. doi: 10.1007/s00113-015-0046-3.
7
[Polytrauma in children and adolescents. Choice of the primary care clinic and importance of pediatric traumatology competence centers].[儿童和青少年的多发伤。初级保健诊所的选择及儿童创伤学能力中心的重要性]
Unfallchirurg. 2015 May;118(5):432-8. doi: 10.1007/s00113-013-2518-7.
8
[Prognosis of polytraumatized patients: estimates in the shock room and intensive care station].[多发伤患者的预后:在休克室和重症监护病房的评估]
Unfallchirurg. 2013 May;116(5):451-64. doi: 10.1007/s00113-012-2343-4.
9
[Is there an association between the rating of illness and injury severity and the experience of emergency medical physicians?].疾病与损伤严重程度评分和急诊医生的经验之间是否存在关联?
Anaesthesist. 2008 Nov;57(11):1069-74. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1454-3.