Suppr超能文献

[How to assess the severity of the multi-system trauma in the emergency-room -- a critical review].

作者信息

Kulla M, Fischer S, Helm M, Lampl L

机构信息

Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Abteilung für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Ulm.

出版信息

Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2005 Dec;40(12):726-36. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870247.

Abstract

For more than 30 years various scoring systems have been used as a method to asses the injury severity of multi-system trauma. They have been used as a tool for triage, for emergency-room quality management, for educational reasons or, nowadays, in order to evaluate the cost effectiveness of either a complete hospital or a single department. This review provides the knowledge to score multi-system traumatized patients after their first treatment in the emergency-room. It shows advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of various traumascores which includes knowledge about the used parameters, the type of validation, the medical system in their country of origin, and of course their mathematical background. Relevant examples like physiological trauma scores (GCS, RTS, MEES), anatomic, injury pattern based scores (ISS, NISS, ICISS), biological aspects, mixed scoring systems (PTS, TRISS, ASCOT) and future developments ("Rixen-pattern", RISC) are illustrated. These scores are explained in detail and discussed as to their practicability.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验