• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

再次剖宫产时严重粘连的发生率及其与既往腹膜关闭方法的关系。

Incidence of significant adhesions at repeat cesarean section and the relationship to method of prior peritoneal closure.

作者信息

Myers Stephen A, Bennett Timothy L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 66160-7316, USA.

出版信息

J Reprod Med. 2005 Sep;50(9):659-62.

PMID:16363753
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of peritoneal closure at prior cesarean section on the occurrence of abdomino-pelvic adhesions at subsequent cesarean section.

STUDY DESIGN

An observational chart review study was performed involving 191 cases of repeat cesarean section occurring from January 2001 through July 30, 2002. An adhesion score was created according to the following: a grade 1 score was assigned when no adhesions were present, a grade 2 when adhesions were present but no surgery required, a grade 3 when adhesiolysis was required and there was inability to exteriorize the uterus, and a grade 4 when adhesiolysis was required prior to delivery. Scores were assigned and tabulated as a result of the review of the operative records of 191 cases. When available, the operative record of prior cesarean section was examined to determine if visceral and parietal peritoneal closure had been performed at the prior operation.

RESULTS

During the year and a half for which data were examined, significant abdominopelvic adhesions (grades 3 and 4) were encountered 21% of the time (40 of 191) at repeat cesarean section. Prior peritoneal closure resulted in significant adhesions in 1 of 18 patients compared to 17 of 40 patients when no prior peritoneal closure was recorded (Fisher's exact probability = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

While preliminary, in the absence of any substantive benefit or published data regarding adhesionformation in cesarean section that contradict this finding, the practice of nonclosure of visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section should be questioned.

摘要

目的

探讨首次剖宫产时腹膜关闭对再次剖宫产时腹盆腔粘连发生情况的影响。

研究设计

进行了一项观察性图表回顾研究,纳入2001年1月至2002年7月30日期间发生的191例再次剖宫产病例。根据以下情况创建粘连评分:无粘连时给予1级评分;有粘连但无需手术时给予2级评分;需要粘连松解且无法娩出子宫时给予3级评分;分娩前需要粘连松解时给予4级评分。通过回顾191例病例的手术记录进行评分并列表。如有可能,检查首次剖宫产的手术记录,以确定上次手术时是否进行了脏腹膜和壁腹膜关闭。

结果

在检查数据的一年半时间里,再次剖宫产时21%(191例中的40例)出现了严重的腹盆腔粘连(3级和4级)。首次剖宫产时进行了腹膜关闭的18例患者中有1例出现了严重粘连,而未记录首次剖宫产腹膜关闭的40例患者中有17例出现了严重粘连(Fisher精确概率 = 0.003)。

结论

虽然是初步研究,但在没有任何实质性益处或已发表的关于剖宫产粘连形成的与该发现相矛盾的数据的情况下,剖宫产时不关闭脏腹膜和壁腹膜的做法值得质疑。

相似文献

1
Incidence of significant adhesions at repeat cesarean section and the relationship to method of prior peritoneal closure.再次剖宫产时严重粘连的发生率及其与既往腹膜关闭方法的关系。
J Reprod Med. 2005 Sep;50(9):659-62.
2
Incidence of adhesions at repeat cesarean delivery.再次剖宫产时粘连的发生率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;196(5):e31-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.09.011.
3
Peritoneal closure at primary cesarean delivery and adhesions.初次剖宫产时的腹膜关闭与粘连
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;106(2):275-80. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000171120.81732.4c.
4
[Non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section. Results from repeat cesarean sections].剖宫产术中腹膜未关闭。再次剖宫产的结果
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2001 Jun 15;113(11-12):451-3.
5
Non-closure versus closure of peritoneum during cesarean section: a randomized study.剖宫产术中腹膜不缝合与缝合的随机对照研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Sep-Oct;128(1-2):267-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.02.021. Epub 2006 May 22.
6
[Closure or non closure of the peritoneum at cesarean section in 2008?].2008年剖宫产术中腹膜是否关闭?
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008 Sep;37(5):463-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 May 20.
7
Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study.剖宫产时关腹与不关腹对粘连的影响:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;206(1):56.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.032. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
8
Prospective study of non-closure or closure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery in 124 women: Impact of prior peritoneal closure at primary cesarean on the interval time between first cesarean section and the next pregnancy and significant adhesion at second cesarean.124名妇女剖宫产术中腹膜不关闭或关闭的前瞻性研究:首次剖宫产时腹膜关闭对首次剖宫产与下次妊娠间隔时间以及第二次剖宫产时显著粘连的影响。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2006 Aug;32(4):396-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00420.x.
9
Closure vs non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean delivery: 16 year study.剖宫产术中脏腹膜与壁腹膜缝合与否:16年研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Sep;87(9):1007-11.
10
Closure vs. nonclosure of the peritoneum at cesarean delivery.剖宫产术中腹膜关闭与不关闭的比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Aug;94(2):103-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.05.003. Epub 2006 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between surgical technique, adhesions and morbidity in women with repeat caesarean section: a retrospective study in a rural hospital in Western Tanzania.坦桑尼亚西部农村医院的一项回顾性研究:重复剖宫产术中手术技术、粘连与发病率的关系。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Oct 4;20(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03229-8.
2
Are the skin scar characteristics and closure of the parietal peritoneum associated with pelvic adhesions?皮肤瘢痕特征及腹膜关闭情况与盆腔粘连有关吗?
Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;15(1):28-32. doi: 10.4274/tjod.55491. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
3
Laparoscopic Management of Adhesions Developed after Peritoneal Nonclosure in Primary Cesarean Section Delivery.
腹腔镜处理初次剖宫产术中腹膜未关闭后形成的粘连
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2018 Feb 1;2018:6901764. doi: 10.1155/2018/6901764. eCollection 2018.
4
Adhesions after abdominal surgery: a systematic review of the incidence, distribution and severity.腹部手术后的粘连:发病率、分布及严重程度的系统评价
Surg Today. 2014 Mar;44(3):405-20. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0591-8. Epub 2013 May 9.