Suppr超能文献

The PUSH tool: a survey to determine its perceived usefulness.

作者信息

Berlowitz Dan R, Ratliff Catherine, Cuddigan Janet, Rodeheaver George T

机构信息

Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Bedford VA Hospital, Bedford, MA, USA.

出版信息

Adv Skin Wound Care. 2005 Nov-Dec;18(9):480-3. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200511000-00011.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the perceived usefulness of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH).

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample identified through the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Web site as users or registered users of the PUSH tool.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

A survey instrument was developed to capture experience, ease of use, and perceived utility and weakness of the PUSH tool.

RESULTS

Of 103 respondents, most (79) agreed or strongly agreed that PUSH required an appropriate amount of time to complete. It was also found to be reliable and easy to use and teach to others. Respondents were not as positive regarding usefulness, with 75% indicating that increased PUSH scores prompt patient and treatment reassessment. Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that improvement is possible in the size subscale (59%), the tissue type subscale (49%), and the exudate amount subscale (32%). Most commonly indicated for improvement was the addition of wound depth information.

CONCLUSION

Respondents generally found PUSH easy to use and helpful in pressure ulcer management. Specific areas of improvement were also identified.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验