半导体激光作为传统龈下刮治和根面平整辅助手段的临床疗效。
Clinical efficacy of semiconductor laser application as an adjunct to conventional scaling and root planing.
作者信息
Kreisler Matthias, Al Haj Haitham, d'Hoedt Bernd
机构信息
Department of Oral Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
出版信息
Lasers Surg Med. 2005 Dec;37(5):350-5. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20252.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
The aim of the in vitro study was to examine the clinical efficacy of semiconductor laser periodontal pocket irradiation as an adjunct to conventional scaling and root planing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Twenty-two healthy patients with a need of periodontal treatment (15 women, 7 men, mean age 45.0 +/- 10.8 years) with at least four teeth in all quadrants, were included. All of them underwent a conventional periodontal treatment including scaling and root planing. Using a split mouth design, two randomly chosen quadrants (one upper and the corresponding lower one) were subsequently treated with an 809 nm GaAlAs laser operated at a power output of 1.0 Watt using a 0.6 mm optical fiber. The teeth in the control quadrants were rinsed with saline. The clinical outcome was evaluated by means of plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), sulcus fluid flow rate (SFFR), Periotest (PT), probing pocket depth (PPD), and clinical attachment loss (CAL) at baseline and at 3 months after treatment. A total of 492 teeth in both groups were evaluated and differences between the laser and the control teeth were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test (P < 0.05).
RESULTS
Teeth treated with the laser revealed a significantly higher reduction in tooth mobility, pocket depth, and clinical attachment loss. Twelve percent of the teeth in the laser group showed an attachment gain of 3 mm or more, compared to 7% in the control group. An attachment gain of 2-3 mm was found in 24% of the teeth in the laser group and 18% in the control group. No significant group differences, however, could be detected for the plaque index, gingival index, bleeding on probing, and the sulcus fluid flow rate.
CONCLUSIONS
The higher reduction in tooth mobility and probing depths is probably not predominantly related to bacterial reduction in the periodontal pockets but to the de-epithelization of the periodontal pockets leading to an enhanced connective tissue attachment. The application of the diode laser in the treatment of inflammatory periodontitis at the irradiation parameters described above is a safe clinical procedure and can be recommended as an adjunct to conventional scaling and root planing.
背景与目的
本体外研究旨在检验半导体激光牙周袋照射作为传统龈下刮治和根面平整辅助治疗方法的临床疗效。
材料与方法
纳入22例需要进行牙周治疗的健康患者(15名女性,7名男性,平均年龄45.0±10.8岁),所有象限至少有四颗牙齿。所有患者均接受了包括龈下刮治和根面平整在内的传统牙周治疗。采用双侧对照设计,随后使用0.6毫米光纤,以1.0瓦特的输出功率操作809纳米的砷化镓铝激光对随机选择的两个象限(一个上颌和对应的下颌象限)进行治疗。对照象限的牙齿用盐水冲洗。通过菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)、探诊出血(BOP)、龈沟液流速(SFFR)、牙周探针(PT)、探诊深度(PPD)和临床附着丧失(CAL)在基线和治疗后3个月时评估临床结果。两组共评估了492颗牙齿,并使用Wilcoxon检验分析激光治疗组和对照牙齿之间的差异(P<0.05)。
结果
接受激光治疗的牙齿在牙齿松动度、牙周袋深度和临床附着丧失方面的降低更为显著。激光治疗组12%的牙齿显示附着增加3毫米或更多,而对照组为7%。激光治疗组24%的牙齿附着增加2至3毫米,对照组为18%。然而,在菌斑指数、牙龈指数、探诊出血和龈沟液流速方面未发现显著的组间差异。
结论
牙齿松动度和探诊深度的更大降低可能主要不是与牙周袋内细菌减少有关,而是与牙周袋的去上皮化导致结缔组织附着增强有关。在上述照射参数下,二极管激光应用于炎症性牙周炎的治疗是一种安全的临床操作,可推荐作为传统龈下刮治和根面平整的辅助治疗方法。