Gruenwald Joerg, Graubaum Hans-Joachim, Busch Regina
Analyze & realize ag / Phytopharm Research, Berlin, Germany.
Arzneimittelforschung. 2005;55(11):669-76. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296916.
In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, prospective study, the clinical efficacy and tolerability of a fixed combination of thyme fluid extract and primose root tincture (Bronchicum Tropfen) was investigated at a dosage of 30 drops (1 ml), taken orally five times daily. 150 outpatients (97 women, 53 men) suffering from acute, not previously treated bronchitis, lasting for less than 48 h, were randomized and treated with either verum (75 patients: 45 women, 30 men) or placebo (75 patients: 52 women, 23 men) over a time period of 7-9 days. 17 patients were excluded from the per-protocol (PP) collective because of either withdrawal from the trial (n = 2) or violations regarding examination time points and/or intake of the study medication (n = 15). The primary outcome criterion for efficacy assessment was the decrease of the Bronchitis Severity Score (BSS) at the end of the study compared to baseline. In the verum group, the BSS decreased from 12.0 +/- 4.4 points at baseline to 1.0 +/- 2.1 at study end compared to a decrease from 11.7 +/- 4.3 points at baseline to 6.5 +/- 4.8 at study end in the placebo group. The inter-group difference of 5.8 points was highly significant (p < or = 10(-3)) in favour of the verum medication [Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis]. At the end of the study, significantly more patients were symptom free in the verum group (58.7%) than in the placebo group (5.3%) as compared by the ITT analysis (secondary outcome criterion). For both parameters, the PP analysis showed comparable results. The results for the concomitant variables of efficacy support the high superiority of the verum medication compared to placebo. The therapeutic effect was more pronounced the stronger the severity of the acute bronchitis was (as proofed by a stratified evaluation based on severity grade). The tolerability was very good in both groups; neither serious adverse events nor clinically relevant findings in the safety parameters were observed. A total of 7 adverse events occurred, 2 in the verum group and 5 in the placebo group. One of the two adverse events in the verum group was considered to be possibly related to the intake of the study medication. Neither serious nor unknown adverse drug reactions were observed. Two drop-outs occurred during the study related to adverse events, both in the placebo group. In the global safety assessment, the tolerability of both medications was rated as "good" or "very good" by more than 90% of the patients and physicians. In the present study, the fixed combination of thyme fluid extract and primrose root tincture was well tolerated and resulted in a clinically relevant and more pronounced decrease of the bronchitis symptoms (primary outcome criterion) and in shortening the duration of acute bronchitis (secondary outcome criterion) when compared to placebo.
在一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、多中心前瞻性研究中,对百里香流浸膏与报春花根酊的固定组合制剂(Bronchicum Tropfen)进行了研究,其口服剂量为30滴(1毫升),每日5次。150例患有急性、未经治疗且病程少于48小时的门诊患者(97名女性,53名男性)被随机分组,在7至9天的时间内,分别接受真药治疗(75例患者:45名女性,30名男性)或安慰剂治疗(75例患者:52名女性,23名男性)。17例患者因退出试验(n = 2)或违反检查时间点及/或研究药物摄入规定(n = 15)而被排除在符合方案(PP)人群之外。疗效评估的主要结局标准是研究结束时与基线相比支气管炎严重程度评分(BSS)的降低。在真药组中,BSS从基线时的12.0±4.4分降至研究结束时的1.0±2.1分,而安慰剂组则从基线时的11.7±4.3分降至研究结束时的6.5±4.8分。两组间5.8分的差异具有高度显著性(p≤10⁻³),表明真药治疗有效 [意向性分析(ITT)]。研究结束时,通过ITT分析(次要结局标准)发现,真药组无症状的患者(58.7%)显著多于安慰剂组(5.3%)。对于这两个参数,PP分析显示了类似的结果。疗效相关变量的结果支持真药治疗相对于安慰剂具有高度优越性。急性支气管炎病情越严重,治疗效果越显著(基于严重程度分级的分层评估证实)。两组的耐受性都非常好;未观察到严重不良事件或安全参数方面的临床相关发现。共发生7起不良事件,真药组2起,安慰剂组5起。真药组的两起不良事件中有一起被认为可能与研究药物的摄入有关。未观察到严重或未知的药物不良反应。研究期间有两例因不良事件退出研究的情况,均发生在安慰剂组。在整体安全性评估中,超过90%的患者和医生将两种药物的耐受性评为“良好”或“非常良好”。在本研究中,百里香流浸膏与报春花根酊的固定组合耐受性良好,与安慰剂相比,可使支气管炎症状在临床上得到显著且更明显的减轻(主要结局标准),并缩短急性支气管炎的病程(次要结局标准)。