• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马洛-克劳恩量表及其各组成部分与防御偏好的关系。

The relationship of the Marlowe-Crowne Scale and its components to defensive preferences.

作者信息

Evans R G

机构信息

Dept. of Psychology, Washburn University of Topeka, Kansas 66621, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1979 Aug;43(4):406-10. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4304_13.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa4304_13
PMID:16366973
Abstract

Two lines of recent research have interpreted the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MC-SDS) as a measure of either need to avoid social disapproval or need to protect and maintain vulnerable self-esteem. In addition, it has been suggested that two component (Attribution and Denial) scores derived from the MC-SDS are differentially related to defensiveness. The present study tested several hypotheses regarding the relationship of the MC-SDS and its components to relative preference for five classes of defensive responses, as measured by the Defense Mechanisms Inventory. Results among females best supported a disapproval-avoidance interpretation of the MC-SDS. while no support was found for the proposed differential validity of the attribution, and denial components. Support for such differential validity was, however, obtained among males. Results for this group suggest that high denial component scorers will opt for protecting vulnerable self-esteem even in the face of possible social disapproval, while high attribution scorers are primarily concerned with avoiding such disapproval. Implications for use of the MCSDS and its components as measures of defensiveness are discussed and suggestions for additional research are presented.

摘要

最近的两项研究表明,马洛-克罗恩社会赞许性量表(MC-SDS)要么是衡量避免社会不认可需求的指标,要么是衡量保护和维持脆弱自尊需求的指标。此外,有人提出,从MC-SDS得出的两个分量表得分(归因和否认)与防御性存在不同的关联。本研究检验了几个假设,这些假设涉及MC-SDS及其分量表与通过防御机制量表所衡量的五类防御反应的相对偏好之间的关系。女性的结果最有力地支持了对MC-SDS的避免不认可解释,而未发现对所提出的归因和否认分量表的差异效度的支持。然而,在男性中获得了对这种差异效度的支持。该组结果表明,即使面对可能的社会不认可,否认分量表得分高的人也会选择保护脆弱的自尊,而归因得分高的人主要关注避免这种不认可。文中讨论了将MC-SDS及其分量表用作防御性测量指标的意义,并提出了进一步研究的建议。

相似文献

1
The relationship of the Marlowe-Crowne Scale and its components to defensive preferences.马洛-克劳恩量表及其各组成部分与防御偏好的关系。
J Pers Assess. 1979 Aug;43(4):406-10. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4304_13.
2
Intellectual ability correlates of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale.
J Pers Assess. 1982 Feb;46(1):59-62. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4601_10.
3
On the two-dimensional nature of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale.
J Pers Assess. 1980 Oct;44(5):507-14. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4405_11.
4
Psychometric properties of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale with adult male sexual offenders.马洛-克劳恩社会赞许性量表在成年男性性犯罪者中的心理测量特性。
Sex Abuse. 2009 Mar;21(1):21-34. doi: 10.1177/1079063208325203.
5
Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale and short Form C: forensic norms.马洛-克劳恩社会赞许性量表及简式C版:法医常模。
J Clin Psychol. 2003 Apr;59(4):483-92. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10136.
6
Suicide ideation and social desirability among school-aged young people.学龄青少年的自杀意念与社会期望
J Adolesc. 2008 Aug;31(4):519-33. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
7
Impact of defensive hostility in cardiovascular disease.心血管疾病中的防御性敌意的影响。
Behav Med. 2010 Jul-Sep;36(3):77-84. doi: 10.1080/08964280903521289.
8
Skin conductance, Marlowe-Crowne defensiveness, and dental anxiety.皮肤电导率、马洛-克劳恩防御性和牙科焦虑症。
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Aug;79(1 Pt 2):611-22. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.611.
9
The Marlowe-Crowne affair: short forms, psychometric structure, and social desirability.马洛-克劳恩事件:简版、心理测量结构与社会赞许性
J Pers Assess. 2002 Oct;79(2):286-305. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7902_11.
10
Repressive and defensive coping during fear and anger.恐惧和愤怒时的压抑性与防御性应对方式。
Emotion. 2003 Sep;3(3):284-302. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.3.284.