Viglione D J, Fals-Stewart W, Moxham E
California School of Professional Psychology, San Diego 92121, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1995 Dec;65(3):502-13. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6503_9.
The authors investigated the effectiveness of various commonly used Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI; Hathaway & McKinley, 1943) indices of exaggeration and malingering in detecting suspected malingering in a military sample of 121 enlisted men. To maximize external validity, only men undergoing psychological evaluation were used as participants. Forty-one participants were identified as suspected malingerers through multiple criteria and were contrasted with schizophrenic-spectrum and clinic outpatient groups. To improve internal validity, the 41 suspected malingering participants were asked to retake the test without exaggerating. Results revealed that there were many false positives and fewer, but nonetheless many, false negatives with standard malingering indices. It appeared that the Gough Dissimulation scale (Gough, 1947) might hold the most promise as a measure of malingering, but other scales are also useful. Individual comparisons between different samples and implications for MMPI-2 (Butcher et al., 1989) are presented.
作者们调查了明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI;哈撒韦与麦金利,1943年)中各种常用的夸大和诈病指标在检测121名现役军人样本中疑似诈病情况时的有效性。为了使外部效度最大化,仅将接受心理评估的男性作为参与者。通过多项标准确定了41名参与者为疑似诈病者,并将他们与精神分裂症谱系和临床门诊患者组进行对比。为了提高内部效度,要求41名疑似诈病的参与者重新进行测试,不得夸大。结果显示,标准诈病指标存在许多假阳性,假阴性较少,但数量依然不少。看起来,作为一种诈病测量方法,高夫掩饰量表(高夫,1947年)可能最具前景,但其他量表也有用。文中呈现了不同样本之间的个体比较以及对MMPI-2(布彻等人,1989年)的启示。