Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Assessment. 2010 Jun;17(2):185-96. doi: 10.1177/1073191109359382. Epub 2010 Feb 2.
There are several strategies, or models, for combining the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) validity indicators to detect malingered psychiatric symptoms. Some scholars have recommended that an elevated F (Infrequency) score should be followed by the inspection of Fp (Infrequency-Psychopathology), whereas a recent meta-analysis indicated that Fp and Ds (Gough's Dissimulation Scale) should be examined. For correctional settings, one model of malingering suggests that F, Fp, and F - K (Gough's Dissimulation Index) should be inspected for one or more elevated scores. Although a large body of research has examined malingering detection with the MMPI-2, this research has typically focused on the contributions of individual validity indicators to differentiate malingered from genuine psychiatric symptoms. Therefore, the current study compared these models of malingering detection on the MMPI-2. Inmate simulators were contrasted with inmates who were hospitalized for psychiatric treatment. Results from classification and logistic regression analyses supported the sequential use of F and Fp in malingering detection.
有几种策略或模型可用于结合明尼苏达多项人格测验-2（MMPI-2）的效度指标来检测伪装的精神症状。一些学者建议，在出现 F（不寻常）分数升高后，应检查 Fp（不寻常-精神病理学），而最近的一项荟萃分析表明，应检查 Fp 和 Ds（古氏伪装量表）。对于惩教环境，一种伪装的模式表明，应检查 F、Fp 和 F-K（古氏伪装指数）是否有一个或多个分数升高。尽管大量研究已经使用 MMPI-2 检查了伪装检测，但这项研究通常侧重于个别效度指标对区分伪装和真实精神症状的贡献。因此，本研究比较了 MMPI-2 上这些伪装检测模型。模拟囚犯与因精神疾病住院治疗的囚犯进行了对比。分类和逻辑回归分析的结果支持在伪装检测中依次使用 F 和 Fp。
