Suppr超能文献

丁丙诺啡与洛非西定用于社区阿片类药物脱毒的比较:一项随机对照试验的结果

A comparison of buprenorphine and lofexidine for community opiate detoxification: results from a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Raistrick Duncan, West David, Finnegan Olwyn, Thistlethwaite Gill, Brearley Roger, Banbery Jo

机构信息

Leeds Addiction Unit, UK.

出版信息

Addiction. 2005 Dec;100(12):1860-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01273.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a buprenorphine opiate detoxification regimen can be considered to be at least as clinically effective as a lofexidine regimen.

DESIGN

An open-label randomized controlled trial (RCT) using a non-inferiority approach. Non-inferiority is demonstrated if, within a 95% confidence interval, buprenorphine performs within a preset tolerance limit of clinically acceptable difference in outcomes and completion rates between the two treatments.

METHODS

Individuals ready for heroin detoxification were given information about the trial and invited to participate. Consenting participants (n = 210) were then randomized to one of the two treatments. Detoxification was undertaken in a specialist out-patient clinic according to predefined protocols. The primary outcome was whether or not an individual completed the detoxification. Abstinence at 1-month follow-up was used as a secondary outcome measure. Additional secondary outcome measures were substance use, dependence, psychological health, social satisfaction, and treatment satisfaction. Data were also collected for individuals who declined randomization and instead chose their treatment (n = 271).

RESULTS

A total of 46% of those on lofexidine and 65% of those on buprenorphine completed detoxification. Of these, 35.7% of the lofexidine and 45.9% of the buprenorphine groups reported abstinence at 1 month. Of those not completing detoxification abstinence was reported at 27.5% and 29.0%, respectively; 271 individuals who opted not to be allocated randomly and instead chose one of the two treatments produced similar results

CONCLUSIONS

Buprenorphine is at least as effective as lofexidine detoxification treatment. Whether or not individuals were randomized to, or chose, a treatment appeared not to affect the study's outcome.

摘要

目的

探讨丁丙诺啡阿片类药物脱毒方案是否可被认为在临床效果上至少与可乐定方案相当。

设计

采用非劣效性方法的开放标签随机对照试验(RCT)。如果在95%置信区间内,丁丙诺啡在两种治疗的结局和完成率的临床可接受差异的预设耐受限度内表现良好,则证明非劣效性。

方法

为准备进行海洛因脱毒的个体提供有关该试验的信息并邀请其参与。然后,同意参与的参与者(n = 210)被随机分配到两种治疗中的一种。根据预先定义的方案在专科门诊进行脱毒。主要结局是个体是否完成脱毒。1个月随访时的戒断情况用作次要结局指标。其他次要结局指标包括物质使用、依赖、心理健康、社会满意度和治疗满意度。还收集了拒绝随机分组而选择自己治疗的个体(n = 271)的数据。

结果

可乐定组46%的参与者和丁丙诺啡组65%的参与者完成了脱毒。其中,可乐定组35.7%的参与者和丁丙诺啡组45.9%的参与者在1个月时报告戒断。未完成脱毒的参与者中,报告戒断的分别为27.5%和29.0%;271名选择不随机分配而是选择两种治疗之一的个体产生了类似的结果。

结论

丁丙诺啡在脱毒治疗方面至少与可乐定一样有效。个体是否被随机分配到一种治疗或选择一种治疗似乎不影响研究结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验