Doran C M, Shanahan M, Bell J, Gibson A
School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2004 Jun;23(2):171-5. doi: 10.1080/095952304100017044154.
The purpose of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of detoxification from heroin using buprenorphine in a specialist clinic versus a shared care setting. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with a total of 115 heroin-dependent patients receiving a 5-day treatment regime of buprenorphine. The specialist clinic was a community-based treatment agency in inner-city Sydney. Shared care involved treatment by a general practitioner supplemented by weekend dispensing and some concurrent counselling at the specialist clinic. Quantification of resource use was limited to inputs for treatment provision. The primary outcome measure used in the economic analysis was the proportion of each group that completed detoxification and achieved an initial 7-day period of abstinence. Buprenorphine detoxification in the shared care setting was estimated to be 24 dollars more expensive per patient than treatment at the clinic, which had an average treatment cost of 332 dollars per patient. Twenty-three per cent of the shared care patients and 22% of the clinic patients reported no opiate use during the withdrawal period. These results suggest that the provision of buprenorphine treatment for heroin dependence in shared care and clinic appear to be equally cost-effective.
本研究的目的是对在专科诊所与共享照护环境中使用丁丙诺啡进行海洛因脱毒治疗进行成本效益分析。开展了一项随机对照试验,共有115名海洛因依赖患者接受了为期5天的丁丙诺啡治疗方案。专科诊所是悉尼市中心的一家社区治疗机构。共享照护包括由全科医生进行治疗,并在周末配药,同时在专科诊所进行一些咨询。资源使用的量化仅限于治疗提供的投入。经济分析中使用的主要结果指标是每组完成脱毒并实现最初7天禁欲期的比例。据估计,共享照护环境下的丁丙诺啡脱毒治疗每位患者比诊所治疗贵24美元,诊所的平均治疗成本为每位患者332美元。23%的共享照护患者和22%的诊所患者报告在戒断期未使用阿片类药物。这些结果表明,在共享照护和诊所中提供丁丙诺啡治疗海洛因依赖似乎具有同等的成本效益。