Berry John
MacNeal Cancer Center, 3340 South Oak Park Avenue, Berwyn, IL 60402, USA.
Clin Ther. 2005 Nov;27(11):1671-84. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.013.
Five years of tamoxifen therapy has been the standard of care for the adjuvant treatment of estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer for many years and was the first hormonal treatment for postmenopausal women with advanced or metastatic disease. The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) anastrozole, exemestane, and letrozole offer new treatment options, although their efficacy has not been compared directly in randomized, double-blind, controlled trials in any breast cancer treatment setting.
: The goal of this article was to review the results of recent randomized, controlled clinical trials of the AIs in the settings of neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and advance d/metastatic breast cancer.
MEDLINE was searched for descriptions of randomized, controlled clinical trials published from 1990 to 2005 using the terms breast cancer, aromatase, aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, exemestane, and letrozole. Abstracts from the proceedings of several oncology meetings held between 2001 and 2005 were searched to capture relevant emerging data.
In 2 Phase III trials comparing an AI with tamoxifen for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in postmenopausal women, disease-free survival was significantly improved with anastrozole and letrozole compared with tamoxifen as initial adjuvant treatment (P = 0.01 and P = 0.003, respectively). A switch to either anastrozole (2 Phase III trials) or exemestane (1 Phase III trial) after 2 to 3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy was more effective in reducing the risk of recurrence than continued tamoxifen therapy (P = 0.006, P < 0.002, and P < 0.001, respectively); data on switching to letrozole are expected soon. In another Phase III trial, letrozole was found to improve disease-free survival in the extended adjuvant setting (P < or = 0.001) and was the only AI consistently more effective than tamoxifen in the neoadjuvant setting. In 3 Phase III studies (1 letrozole vs tamoxifen, 2 anastrozole vs tamoxifen), both anastrozole and letrozole were more efficacious than tamoxifen in the first-line setting, and some patients receiving letrozole had better overall response rates compared with those receiving anastrozole in the second-line setting (19.1% vs 12.3%, respectively; P = 0.013). In a patient-preference study, those receiving letrozole reported fewer adverse events than those receiving anastrozole (43% vs 65%; P < 0.003), and more patients preferred letrozole to anastrozole (68% vs 32%; P < 0.01).
Currently, anastrozole and letrozole are associated with the most complete data over the breast cancer care continuum, with efficacy in early-stage, locally advanced, and metastatic disease. In-direct comparisons suggest stronger evidence for the use of letrozole compared with other AIs for breast cancer in postmenopausal women who require estrogen-deprivation therapy. Data from randomized, double-blind comparative studies will help clarify the differences between AIs.
多年来,他莫昔芬治疗5年一直是雌激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌辅助治疗的标准方案,并且是绝经后晚期或转移性疾病的首个激素治疗方法。第三代芳香化酶抑制剂(AIs)阿那曲唑、依西美坦和来曲唑提供了新的治疗选择,尽管在任何乳腺癌治疗环境中,它们的疗效尚未在随机、双盲、对照试验中直接比较。
本文的目的是回顾近期AIs在新辅助、辅助及晚期/转移性乳腺癌治疗中进行的随机对照临床试验结果。
检索MEDLINE中1990年至2005年发表的随机对照临床试验描述,检索词为乳腺癌、芳香化酶、芳香化酶抑制剂、阿那曲唑、依西美坦和来曲唑。检索2001年至2005年期间召开的几次肿瘤学会议的会议记录摘要,以获取相关的新出现数据。
在两项比较AIs与他莫昔芬用于绝经后妇女乳腺癌辅助治疗的Ⅲ期试验中,与他莫昔芬作为初始辅助治疗相比,阿那曲唑和来曲唑显著改善了无病生存期(分别为P = 0.01和P = 0.003)。辅助他莫昔芬治疗2至3年后改用阿那曲唑(两项Ⅲ期试验)或依西美坦(一项Ⅲ期试验)在降低复发风险方面比继续使用他莫昔芬治疗更有效(分别为P = 0.006、P < 0.002和P < 0.001);改用来看曲唑的数据预计很快会公布。在另一项Ⅲ期试验中,来曲唑在延长辅助治疗中改善了无病生存期(P≤0.001),并且是新辅助治疗中唯一始终比他莫昔芬更有效的AIs。在三项Ⅲ期研究(一项来曲唑对比他莫昔芬、两项阿那曲唑对比他莫昔芬)中,阿那曲唑和来曲唑在一线治疗中均比他莫昔芬更有效,并且在二线治疗中,一些接受来曲唑治疗的患者总体缓解率优于接受阿那曲唑治疗的患者(分别为19.1%对12.3%;P = 0.013)。在一项患者偏好研究中,接受来曲唑治疗的患者报告的不良事件少于接受阿那曲唑治疗的患者(43%对65%;P < 0.003),并且更多患者更喜欢来曲唑而非阿那曲唑(68%对32%;P < 0.01)。
目前,阿那曲唑和来曲唑在乳腺癌治疗全程中拥有最完整的数据,对早期、局部晚期和转移性疾病均有效。间接比较表明,对于需要雌激素剥夺治疗的绝经后乳腺癌妇女,与其他AIs相比,来曲唑使用的证据更强。随机双盲对照研究的数据将有助于阐明AIs之间的差异。