Suppr超能文献

现代环境真的对我们有害吗?:重新审视人口与流行病学转变

Are modern environments really bad for us?: revisiting the demographic and epidemiologic transitions.

作者信息

Gage Timothy B

机构信息

Department of Anthropology and Department of Epidemiology, University at Albany-SUNY, Albany, New York 12222, USA.

出版信息

Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005;Suppl 41:96-117. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20353.

Abstract

It is a common assumption that agriculture and modernization have been detrimental for human health. The theoretical argument is that humans are adapted to hunter-gatherer lifestyles, and that the agricultural and "modern" environments are novel and hence likely to be detrimental. In particular, changes in nutrition, and population size and distribution with the adoption of agriculture, are considered to increase the risk of infectious disease mortality. Similarly, changes due to modern lifestyles, notably changes in nutrition, smoking, exercise, and stress, are thought to be associated with an increased risk of degenerative disease mortality in the industrial environment. This paper reviews the available literature on the history and prehistory of total mortality (the demographic transition) and cause of death (the epidemiologic transition), and finds that neither agriculture nor modernization is associated with increases in mortality, i.e., declines in health. First, mortality does not appear to have increased during the transition to agriculture, or during the early phases of the industrial revolution. Clearly, infectious diseases have declined with modernization. Second, the empirical data, when uncorrected for misclassification of cause of death, do suggest an increase in degenerative disease mortality, at least until the mid 20th century, when these causes of death clearly began to decline. All studies that correct for misclassification of cause of death, however, find that the general decline in degenerative disease mortality began much earlier, perhaps as early as the 1850s in the developed countries. This is about the same time that infectious disease mortality began to decline in these countries. The exception is neoplasms, which increased with modernization until quite recently. Part of the increase in neoplasms may be attributable to increases in smoking during the course of modernization. Nevertheless, the overall risk of degenerative disease mortality appears to have declined with modernization. The fact that the decline in the risk of infectious disease mortality, and the decline in risk of degenerative disease mortality, are largely coordinated suggests that the causes of both declines may be related. Historical trends in morbidity, and potential causes of the decline in infectious and degenerative disease mortality, are briefly considered.

摘要

人们普遍认为农业和现代化对人类健康有害。理论观点是,人类适应狩猎采集的生活方式,而农业和“现代”环境是新出现的,因此可能有害。特别是,随着农业的采用,营养、人口规模和分布的变化被认为会增加传染病死亡风险。同样,现代生活方式带来的变化,尤其是营养、吸烟、运动和压力方面的变化,被认为与工业环境中退行性疾病死亡风险增加有关。本文回顾了关于总死亡率(人口转变)和死因(流行病学转变)的历史和史前的现有文献,发现农业和现代化都与死亡率上升(即健康状况下降)无关。首先,在向农业过渡期间或工业革命早期,死亡率似乎并未上升。显然,传染病随着现代化而减少。其次,未经死因误分类校正的实证数据确实表明退行性疾病死亡率有所上升,至少在20世纪中叶之前是这样,那时这些死因明显开始下降。然而,所有校正了死因误分类的研究都发现,退行性疾病死亡率的普遍下降开始得要早得多,在发达国家可能早在19世纪50年代就开始了。这与这些国家传染病死亡率开始下降的时间大致相同。例外的是肿瘤,直到最近随着现代化还在增加。肿瘤增加的部分原因可能归因于现代化过程中吸烟率的上升。尽管如此,随着现代化,退行性疾病死亡的总体风险似乎有所下降。传染病死亡风险下降和退行性疾病死亡风险下降在很大程度上是协调一致的,这一事实表明两者下降的原因可能有关。本文简要考虑了发病率的历史趋势以及传染病和退行性疾病死亡率下降的潜在原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验